“CE5” has a lot of baggage, but it’s easy shorthand. Regardless of the baggage, I’m open to the idea consciousness is mixed into the soup that is UAP and a deeper understanding of the universe.
I’ve chosen to be skeptical of Garry Nolan due to his history both working together with CIA and his work in the UFO field. I didn’t know about the Defence and Space company Copernicus Space Corporation, but seeing it’s ran by ex-military and establishment profiles… I guess I have to distance myself from these elements of the UFO/UAP discussion.
I believe he was initially approached to look into and study individuals who encountered UAP as he had the only equipment to do so. I’m less skeptical of Garry as he’s approaching this from a scientific lens and publishing papers to be peer reviewed.
It’s frustrating that neither Nolan or Loeb can talk about what they’ve seen but makes sense that they need to finish analyzing and publish first. That said, I’m really curious what it was.
I share your frustration. I’m sure they are waiting for the peer review process, which is the correct way to do this if you intend to bring the scientific community fully into the fold.
Add comment