The 2023 RAND study on the tendency for UAP to be seen in remote areas is interesting. But then again, it could also be a case of seeing things more clearly since there is less ‘noise’ in the sky outside population centers.
Moreover this article strikes me as just applying humanity’s latest tech to the UAP problem.
Personally, I’m tending toward Vallee’s hypothesis that the stealthiness has more to do with extra dimensionality of the phenomenon. That is, the way UAP blink in and out of sight and the often reported combining of multiple objects into one, or vis versa, is better explained if UAP are multidimensional in nature. They might still be extraterrestrial probes, but they could be something far weirder.
Personally, I’m tending toward Vallee’s hypothesis that the stealthiness has more to do with extra dimensionality of the phenomenon. That is, the way UAP blink in and out of sight and the often reported combining of multiple objects into one, or vis versa, is better explained if UAP are multidimensional in nature. They might still be extraterrestrial probes, but they could be something far weirder.
I think this hypothesis makes sense based on the alleged observations. I’m getting ready to start Dimensions by Jacques Vallee. I’ve heard it’s a good read.
I’m starting to become a fan of the articles on The Debrief. Their reporting has been relatively measured. This article in particular seems to focus on the aspects of UAP that almost everyone can agree on
Add comment