Sensor calibration will assist in differentiating true UAP from prosaic explanations.
AARO is working to declassify more “full-motion videos.”
AARO is closely collaborating with Space Force, US Space Command, NRO, and NASA to review reports in air, space, and sea.
Interesting points made by reddit user adam_n_eve.
Some UAP reports involved objects that “potentially exhibited one or more concerning performance characteristics such as high-speed travel or unusual maneuverability,”
The report also states that none of the UAP reports from the period in question have been directly linked to foreign activities by any U.S. adversaries or other state actors.
Insufficient data from various sensors and other collection platforms “can cause observational misperceptions,” the report adds, noting that as better data is collected over time, “most UAP will likely resolve to ordinary phenomena and significantly reduce the amount of UAP case submissions.”
“only a very small percentage of UAP reports display interesting signatures, such as high-speed travel and unknown morphologies.”
so as we all thought. MOST of the UAPs probably could be explained if they had sufficient data and they dont actually show any “exotic” properties. But it’s the “small percentage” that we’ve always been interested in and at last they’re admitting that these things have “concerning performance”, that they aren’t from russia / china etc and that even with better data they’d not be able to resolve what they are.
So what are we left with other than what we’ve all thought they are from day 1?
Even if it isn’t ETs the answers would still be cool, surely?
I try not to interject my personal beliefs into discussions, as I don’t feel it’s appropriate as a mod. I’d rather just help facilitate discussion. However, I wouldn’t be surprised if this phenomenon represents something far more profound than ET.
I do agree with you, though. It doesn’t matter what the actual answer is. Something is going on, and any answer would be interesting regardless.
I think it is OK for you to give your personal opinion, it would only be wrong if you used it as a way to decide who to ban. That should be objective, to the extent that is possible.
Add comment