TheTrueLinuxDev, 10 months ago Something like this requires a constitution amendment…
Something like this requires a constitution amendment…
I_am_10_squirrels, 10 months ago Seems like a good start, but I wonder why it doesn’t include judicial.
Seems like a good start, but I wonder why it doesn’t include judicial.
ozoned, 10 months ago Don’t worry it has 0 chance of passing.
Don’t worry it has 0 chance of passing.
SkepticElliptic, 10 months ago (edited 10 months ago) It could, because the requirements will be laughable. This is just a way for them to obfuscate their investment via a third party while virtue signaling. It’s also a way for them to finger point during election season.
It could, because the requirements will be laughable. This is just a way for them to obfuscate their investment via a third party while virtue signaling.
It’s also a way for them to finger point during election season.
ozoned, 10 months ago Finger pointing! That is definitely something a politician excels at.
Finger pointing! That is definitely something a politician excels at.
Idrunkenlysignedup, 10 months ago “They aren’t my stocks, they’re my wife’s/husband’s/daughter’s/son’s” - every politician
“They aren’t my stocks, they’re my wife’s/husband’s/daughter’s/son’s” - every politician
SkepticElliptic, 10 months ago “my wealth manager does all that stuff, sure we have a weekly golf game together, but that doesn’t affect the trades he makes”
“my wealth manager does all that stuff, sure we have a weekly golf game together, but that doesn’t affect the trades he makes”
Add comment