Susan_Larson_TN, to MIguns
@Susan_Larson_TN@mastodon.online avatar

deleted_by_moderator

    •
    Susan_Larson_TN,
    @Susan_Larson_TN@mastodon.online avatar

    In conclusion, the interaction between the and , along with the changes instigated by the , forms a multifaceted legal landscape requiring meticulous . The of and unequivocally the of from , preserving the and of the . (7/8)

    GottaLaff, to LGBTQ
    @GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

    Via Andrew Weissmann:

    The new anti-gay ruling falsely dons First Amendment garb (the State cannot force someone to speak against their religious beliefs) when the decision really says business interests trump anti-discrimination laws, since the person wasn’t required to speak at all.

    Susan_Larson_TN,
    @Susan_Larson_TN@mastodon.online avatar

    @GottaLaff All this goes back to the which is blatantly , a cannot modify the which still directly the of which is exactly what happened after the was passed.

    It also violates People's right to You cannot allow any group to discriminate under law targeting any american citizen.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • osvaldo12
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • normalnudes
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • tester
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines
    •