interfluidity, to random
@interfluidity@zirk.us avatar

“To even admit you are acting out of a perception of potential liability is thought in some circles to create a risk of liability. But this thinking in some cases creates enormous risk because the people who are articulating risk only think along one line of vulnerability, the one they understand—or because their logic is easily bent towards a pre-determined conclusion by ideologues prepared to manipulate it.” https://timothyburke.substack.com/p/academia-on-the-inside

interfluidity,
@interfluidity@zirk.us avatar

@Alon @BenRossTransit @djc obviously people targeting epithets directly at people walking by is more visceral than a Charles Murray talk.

but (referring back to the piece that inspired the thread), the vast majority of the protest is not that at all, but might still be uncomfortable, disturbing, hurtful to people simply by virtue of its content. and that should be tolerated, even though i agree in practice there have been less-than-uniform standards of that sort of toleration.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • cubers
  • osvaldo12
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • everett
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines