It is not necessary to kill any children. Its called “collateral damage”. During war, this is unavoidable. During war with hamas(Isis), they go to great lengths to maximize this number to benefit their propaganda.
If you ask me, I would sacrifice every last one of them in order to eradicating hamas(Isis). Western civilization/values are worth more than the children killed in the hands of hamas(Isis).
Now I will direct this question back at you, What is the maximum number of children who need to die before hamas(Isis) surrender?
Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable, does not in itself constitute a war crime. International humanitarian law and the Rome Statute permit belligerents to carry out proportionate attacks against military objectives,[17] even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur.
Also, if you want some more insight, he speakers from experience:
You would give up you basic human rights for them?
Keep in mind, if Israel let hamas stay in power, it will prove to the scattered Isis cells that kidnappings can and will bring democracies to their knees.
What will happen all across Europe in that scenario?
Hamas must be plucked from the root, condemned and thrown away!
And yes, collateral damage is terrible, but it does not give a free pass for genocide.
Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civilians during an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable, does not in itself constitute a war crime. International humanitarian law and the Rome Statute permit belligerents to carry out proportionate attacks against military objectives,[17] even when it is known that some civilian deaths or injuries will occur.
There is a very very big IF about it.
Hamas and their supporters attempted to genocide Israelis(and will do it again and again until they succeede). So yes, they made Israel go hunt the threat.
All you’re saying is that, to you, it’s fine for the IDF to kill every single child in Gaza as long as someone has to pay the price for it in court later.
To me, the IDF can do whatever it finds to be necessary to ensure the safety of the people of Israel. If hamas put children in their way, the IDF is not at fault.
So? Flag burning has been a protest method for decades
I would maybe accept this argument if it wasn’t for the fact that the US flag is burned while Palestinian flag is raised in its place and “death to America chants” in the background.
I don’t know. Seems like pissing in your own drinking water.
Really? I belive A few large bombs are cheaper that drafting so many people and being at war for so long. Think of just the social services that go along with wartime. Anything from widdow compensation to solder psychologist evaluations.
I don’t know about you, but when I’m worried, I am more alert.
Let’s say my some kids are playing in the sea, my worry will keep me looking over to see everything is OK.
So in our case, if we the individuals are worried about extreme Muslim movements/communities, we will be more alert around them and keep an eye out. This way a planned attack is harder to carry out.
US hints at support for sanctions over ICC warrants on Israel (www.bbc.com)
Biden: What's happening in Gaza is not genocide (www.gmanetwork.com)
“What’s happening in Gaza is not genocide. We reject that,” Biden said at a Jewish American Heritage Month event at the White House....
UN says 800,000 people have fled Rafah as Israel kills dozens in Gaza (www.aljazeera.com)
'Children Are Starving': Rafah Suffers as Israel Halts All Aid and Escalates Assault (www.commondreams.org)
Politics gets in the way of pop as Israel’s war in Gaza overshadows Eurovision Song Contest (www.nbcnews.com)