GreatGrapeApe

@GreatGrapeApe@reddthat.com

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

GreatGrapeApe,

Don’t forget has never assessed what they have to offer, nor do they make efforts to improve.

GreatGrapeApe,

They are blocking others from trading based on threats to cease or reduce trading with the other nation. That isn’t illegal at all.

Note I do not support the embargo as it is pointlessly cruel at this point.

GreatGrapeApe,

The USA, like any country, has the right to decide who they trade with and the right to suggest the terms under which they are willing to engage in trade. Other nations have the right to accept those terms or not.

I do not support the embargo but it is ignorant to suggest it is illegal.

GreatGrapeApe,

No they do not declare it to be illegal and in fact outright state that the UN is not interfering in affairs between states.

Try reading your own sources without a bias for what it contains as they make it very clear. There are no laws requiring member nations to trade with one another.

GreatGrapeApe,

Try actually going to the report in question for your first link as your summary misses important parts:

“1. Takes note of the report of the Secretary-General on the implementation of resolution 60/12;1 2. Reiterates its call upon all States to refrain from promulgating and applying laws and measures of the kind referred to in the preamble to the present resolution, in conformity with their obligations under the Charter of the United Nations and international law, which, inter alia, reaffirm the freedom of trade and navigation; 3. Once again urges States that have and continue to apply such laws and measures to take the necessary steps to repeal or invalidate them as soon as possible in accordance with their legal regime; 4. Requests the Secretary-General, in consultation with the appropriate organs and agencies of the United Nations system, to prepare a report on the implementation of the present resolution in the light of the purposes and principles of the Charter and international law and to submit it to the General Assembly at its sixty-second session; 5. Decides to include in the provisional agenda of its sixty-second session the item entitled “Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba”

You’ll note they do not declare the embargo anything but suggest/request that the secretary general do things because the preparers believe these acts violate laws.

In addition “Reaffirming, among other principles, the sovereign equality of States, non-intervention and non-interference in their internal affairs and freedom of international trade and navigation, which are also enshrined in many international legal instruments”, means that they recognize the right of the US to not trade with Cuba.

You misunderstood your reports because you did not click through to the full version. The summary you linked to in your first link has the full report.

Your second link is again a request representing opinions. It is not a declaration by the UN that the embargo is illegal.

GreatGrapeApe,

Your initial claim that I responded to was that the UN declared it was illegal. I am correcting your misunderstanding on that regard because despite your claims they never have declared it illegal.

GreatGrapeApe, (edited )

The Russian population in the USA isn’t demanding we embargo Russia whereas it is Cuban-Americans leading that charge in FL.

Edit changed Cubans to Cuban-Americans as TheDankHold pointed out my error.

GreatGrapeApe,

IME cows were big, dumb and not at all interested in people. Pigs on the other hand have very clear personalities.

GreatGrapeApe,

It kills me how often I see people claim that it is the corporations that are driving climate change and that individuals can do nothing when going plant based would make a huge difference.

GreatGrapeApe,

If you were born after 1985 and are American your views on pork’s flavor aren’t exactly spot on. We moved to leaner breeds in the 1980s and as a result our pork has a lot less flavor than it used to. There’s a richness to heritage breeds like the ones Neiman Ranch sells that have that flavor still. Other nations I do not believe made this shift.

GreatGrapeApe,

Is it murder when you are biologically designed for hunting and eating meat? Unlike the other situations you mentioned I can point to a ludicrous amount of evidence that your body is made to sometimes eat animal proteins.

Whether we should regularly consume animal products or whether our methods of farming animals is sustainable us a different issue, and IMO is the most compelling argument as it is the only thing as an individual you can do to really combat climate change.

GreatGrapeApe,

Most people have consumed animal proteins the catch is they weren’t eating a lot meat regularly. One of my ancestors was upper middle class when he migrated to the USA and founded a small city. His journal talks about his meals and as a wealthy person with a dairy farm he still mostly had stew and rarely ate steak. He wasn’t eating animals all the time and that was 1840-80s. We need to go back to a time when eating a whole chicken among a family of four in a single meal almost never happened IF we continue farming animals which as you noted is a climate change nightmare.

Do you pirate? And do you justify pirating? i.e., what is your piracy philosophy?

Well, my friend, he’s kinda poor he can’t afford some books and some streaming services, so he pirates. He pirate books, audiobook and videos and other stuff. Sometimes he buys books he likes a lot out of loyalty to the author (yeah, I don’t understand it either), he likes to read physical books, but yeah, if he hates the...

GreatGrapeApe,

Disney’s copyright is on their version of the story not the story in general. You can make a Snow White movie using the names for the dwarves that Disney did not originate but you couldn’t use their character designs for example.

GreatGrapeApe,

I’ll pirate anything I have owned but for various reasons I now can only license so all my old games I bought I’ll have ROMs of as well as albums whose labels no longer exist or are not in circulation such as obscure Punk tracks.

GreatGrapeApe,

Shares right now can be sold, but if you stole all the stock from outside sources and gave it to the workers no one would purchase that stock ever again as there would be no reason to think you would not steal again.

In CEO’s cases if they get paid $1 they either take loans against the value of the stock that they can later move or the business provides them a series of allowances and an expense account. It is usually the latter where the business gives them a home and a credit card that covers everything.

GreatGrapeApe,

Stocks have value but part of it is speculative.

If the company bought back the shares that could destroy most companies as it is almost impossible to have enough cash reserves to cover the value of your company. You can’t get loans for it because you would have to give up stock as collateral which would defeat the purpose of the buyback.

If the stock is bought back then those shares will have lost value as the company has less cash in reserve and is clearly worth less than it was before.

If the shares can only be held by employees they would have no real value. getting a job at that company would likely be very expensive as you would have to buy in and there would be little incentive to do so.

Basically your idea won’t work IRL in any form and would likely destroy the company really quickly. Is it safe to presume you have no formal education in economics because this is intro level stuff.

GreatGrapeApe,

It’s because he positions himself as an economic expert despite having no degrees in economics

GreatGrapeApe,

US credit scores are entirely based on your finances. My understanding is China has multiple systems being tested some of which are not based purely on finances but nothing is formal or universal at this point.

China’s system could be more authoritarian but we cannot know until they choose a version that is.

GreatGrapeApe,

Do they? They are based on your finances and financial history.

GreatGrapeApe,

The Chinese government is testing several systems in the country and last I checked nothing is formally in place. There are versions whose system does include non-financial elements which is incredibly disturbing but nothing is formally being followed so it is possible they abandon those versions.

GreatGrapeApe,

It just means you don’t know what the right is and are proud about that fact. It doesn’t upset anyone but why make obviously uninformed claims like that?

GreatGrapeApe,

That’s not what the Horseshoe theory proposes. It suggests that the tactics used by both sides are similar, which is often true, and that either ideology could appeal to the people that get involved with far right and far left groups which is the part that is completely unproven and is absolute bullshit.

The guy who joins ISIS because of how their views of Islam are not honored who thinks the degeneration of society is due to the movement away from Allah is not going to become a communist under different circumstances much like a Marxist is unlikely to adopt a pro-monarchist POV.

Again Horseshoe theory is bullshit but your source says nothing at all about it.

GreatGrapeApe,

You can think it is good but you have a remarkably flawed concept of democracy if you think outright fixing elections is democratic in any way. What you are rejecting is the right of people to decide how they should be ruled. That brings about significant issues as to the legitimacy of said government.

GreatGrapeApe,

When you get to decide who can run and mandate tbat only one ideology can be represented do you think that’s a free election or a fair one? It cannot on any level represent the people because only candidates the state approves of can run. That isn’t how it works in democracies. It is why Cuba is not free or democratic because…it’s an authoritarian state like China is.

GreatGrapeApe,

The eligibility is directly determined by the state and they will not permit non-socialists from running which means it cannot be free or fair. It’s literally part of the definition of what free and fair elections are. So no not everyone can run. In fact ONLY socialist can run which is why the elections are fraudulent.

Citizens in non-democracies frequently lack the free speech to oppose the government openly so things like an approval rating in Cuba mean nothing except to indicate the people who are foolish enough to think they are real.

Do more Cubans think they live in a democracy? Could they give their actual opinion without reprisal? No they cannot.

Cuba is an authoritarian state with no real democratic element. Im not sure how you don’t know what “democratic” “free and fair election”, and “authoritarian” means but there you go.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ethstaker
  • Durango
  • GTA5RPClips
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • vwfavf
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines