That’s true for all types of society. But it also means that a completely anarchist society is more stable than the rest because the means of self defence are equally distributed and that everyone would rise against such authoritarian attack.
It doesn’t mean that every person has equal ability to physically defend themselves, but that society has the mechanisms to defend everyone that is being attacked. A grandma doesn’t need to be able to self defend against a thug in the street if the people nearby do it for her.
The second paragraph is not relevant as there are no historical examples of a dictator getting into power from within an anarchist society.
They have been maintaining two apps since many years. The change is going from Safari’s WebKit to Gecko, the same they use for Android and desktop systems. It probably means less work for them as they can share more easily changes from the other builds to iOS.
You just described neofeudalism and “anarcho”-capitalism. Those don’t have anything to do with anarchism, just americans muddying the waters by trying to confuse semantics.
Emma Goldman: My Disillusionment In Russia (szmer.info)
There are very few books on anarchism or anarchist authors in Poland - and even fewer female authors....
Thanks ... (jlai.lu)
Oh no, Anarchists! (slrpnk.net)
We happy? Yeah, we happy. (startrek.website)
Israel ‘hit squad’ kills three in West Bank hospital operation (www.aljazeera.com)
Apple is finally allowing Firefox to use its own engine on the iPhone (but only in the EU) (www.theverge.com)
It's a simple world view (feddit.de)
Decisions, Decisions! (lemmy.world)