Then they can go the “god is not literally all powerful as he can’t do logical conflicting things together”, when then asked why, either because he is “only” maximally powerful and to obey logic. Or because he would have to destroy logic for that and it would break any concept like good or evil and his creation would lose all good as well and free will becomes absurd too because there is literally no logic, so how would a person use their will?
The argument is basically that it does too much and as the motto of Unix was basically “make it do 1 thing and that very well”, systemd goes against that idea.
You might think it is silly because what is the issue with it doing many things. Arguably, it harms customization and adaptability, as you can’t run only 2/3 of systemd with 1/3 being replaced with that super specific optimisation for your specific use case. Additional, again arguably, it apparently makes it harder to make it secure as it has a bigger attack surface.
I understand your point and I want to make clear that my own opinion is not in favor of systemd or against systemd. I am very much neutral. I just expressed my understanding of the arguments. But I welcome the discussion.
I tried to express my understanding of the arguments. I don’t know and I couldn’t argue either case to a point that it is worth adding to the conversation
I think it is only about the meme(?) and how the premise of the content is wrong and through that any discussion about the argument itself is pointless.
Your criticism is valid but it’s based on accepting the premise that they already rejected.
There are clitoris deniers? How? Like porn is everywhere, you don’t even need to find someone anymore. You need to be able to read or understand history or even basic science. You just need to be able to exist online.
I kinda get the female orgasm thing like woman were shamed for anything remotely sexual and I guess a lot or even most women tried to hide anything and everything. Obviously men didn’t learned or cared about pleasure for the wife, even if they truly would love and adore them and would be willing to enjoy it together. But of course, a lot of, or even most men were fucking toxic shit bags.
Not saying it isn’t ridiculous but like there is some stupid feedback shit.
There isn’t a legal precedent. Unless I misunderstood, this is a settlement and settlements aren’t! Legal precedent. Which is why big e.g. pharma likes them, because then they don’t have the legal precedent for the next case.
So just to make sure, I am not American and I am wondering if I get this right. If prompt by the choice between Biden who (at least from your pov) supports genocide and trump who said clearly that he would let Russia take Ukraine, and has been completely silent on the matter which aligns with his exclusive focus on america, and had Israeli minister of national security express support for him as he expects trump to give them for freedom to fight Hamas, you want someone who supports Palestine to vote for trump? Just wondering.
I didn’t mean it so serious. I just tried to express that you seem to have experience with it and I am wondering what you have to deal with. I am sorry if it came across negatively.
Honestly I am mostly bothered by the “reddit atheist” stereotype. Most of the atheist even on Reddit, that I have met, even in Reddit, were as annoying or pleasant as everyone else. But it feels like if you oppose religious nonsense as it gets pushed in your face online, “everyone” thinks you are some radical who hates all e.g. christians, while in reality you might intentionally buy some handmade crafts for the local church to support some charity and support your elderly local community by rewarding their social efforts.
Qualia is, if I am not mistaken, totally subjective. My argument is that how could you tell that a computer doesn’t have qualia and prove to me that you have qualia. While I wouldn’t limit it to qualia. What can you detect in other people that an ai couldn’t replicate? Because as long as they are able to replicate all these qualities, you can’t tell if an ai is “true” or not, as it might have those qualities or might just replicate them.
Spoiler: they are all terrible (lemmy.world)
Jesus vs. Logic (lemmy.world)
Systemd controversy be like (sh.itjust.works)
ich_iel (sopuli.xyz) German
Quelle
Native capitalism (jemmy.jeena.net)
New guy just dropped (lemmy.world)
We get it, it hit 4% (programming.dev)
In all seriousness it’s very exciting, I just don’t need to see the same information worded 20 different ways from random clickbait sites lol
Yuzu & Citra devs fold to Nintendo's demands | Pay $2.3million to settle, take down github, domains, patreon, discord, with immediate effect. (m.youtube.com)
A sad day for emulation and open source advocates, and a reminder that Nintendo can and will destroy you if they see fit....
USA leftists in favor of voting for Biden: What other direct action should we do?
A few things that are accessible within the USA include:...
MySQL moment (lemmy.world)
Atheists of lemmy what is a stereotype about us that is just not true?
PERFECT in-line article link (lemmy.world)
Since the Turing Test seems NOT to be an accurate way to check for true AI, what is? What's will be the indicator that tells us it's arrived? I can't imagine; everything seems falsifiable.
Edit: After reading the discussion, I figured I’d let GPT4 speak for itself:...