alsaaas

alsaaas, 21 days ago (edited 20 days ago)

not even rsa4090? (tbh i have no idea about cryptography, any of those terms or what elliptic keys are and why they are better… like why aren’t they the default in GPG?)

alsaaas, 21 days ago

I can’t tell what song it is… :/ Any clues?

alsaaas, 21 days ago (edited 21 days ago)

I’m glad Fedora comes with the most usable no-bs/out-of-the-way (in my subjective experience) DE by default. Yes I do run it with Tweaks and a few extensions, but otherwise I have no need for extensive customization for customization’s sake (which seems so many ppls problem with GNOME, smth that I couldn’t find more irrelevant), since everything about its UI/UX is so intuitive. I understand if people don’t like its opinionated workflow, but it’s just right for me personally…

I don’t get the proposal either way bc Fedora has always been the spearhead of vanilla GNOME and there is an official KDE spin iirc

alsaaas, 22 days ago

hussy

alsaaas, 22 days ago

I- don’t get it

alsaaas, 22 days ago (edited 22 days ago)

ok lol, but no

what did the hussy ever do to you?

alsaaas, 22 days ago

the average brain on Windows…

“wdym a different OS doesn’t behave exactly like Winsows? That just means it’s bad!”

“It’s Linux’ fault that my proprietary software/configurator for overpriced hardware gimmicks isn’t working and definitely not just the vendor not giving enough of a shit to provide support (or at least help with community drivers) on other platforms as well!!1!”

alsaaas, 22 days ago

well it is the depiction of an imagined humanist (/communist) future. ig there is quite a bit of overlap

alsaaas, 22 days ago (edited 22 days ago)

snaps are a proprietary vendor-locked format, the only redeeming quality is being able to run them in cli (once Flatpak get that too, there is no valid reason for snaps to exist).

I just find it midly infuriating (if that even is a thing, meaning I hate it but it’s not that significant for me to distro hop on my work laptop) to have two “universal” package formats on my system with Canonical shoving the objectively worse one (from a free/libre pov) down my throat…

alsaaas, 22 days ago

no you didn’t, you can install flatpak using the terminal but iirc flatpak are mostly made with GUI applications in mind, while snaps support installing command line utils quite well

alsaaas, 26 days ago (edited 25 days ago)

lemmy.dbzer0.com is the home of the biggest lemmy pircacy community and will probably also welcome this one with open arms

alsaaas, 27 days ago

I don’t think so, doesn’t look like it iirc

alsaaas, 28 days ago

we making it into techo-feudalism with that pattern 🗣️🗣️🗣️

alsaaas, 28 days ago (edited 26 days ago)

LOTR: The Fellowship of the Ring (Directors Cut)

should be good in filtering out some of the people I wouldn’t want to interact with anyway

alsaaas, 28 days ago

That’s not the RAF I’d join /hj

alsaaas, 28 days ago (edited 20 days ago)

I’m sure a good social security net along with free housing would be a good prevention as well

alsaaas, 28 days ago (edited 27 days ago)

this is gold

like unironically the best meme I have seen this week

alsaaas, 28 days ago

F in chat for the “mhhhm” you probably got

alsaaas, 1 month ago

Einfach “Mamer” schreiben und gut is

alsaaas, 1 month ago (edited 29 days ago)

capitalism corrupts everything it touches with enough time

can’t wait for the fediverse to die 🙂

EDIT: I thought it was obvious that my illogical phrase, in combination with the emoji, would be recognized as sarcasm, but apparently y’all need a big “/s”

alsaaas, 1 month ago

hmm ok where to start

first of all, I’m sorry if my

In what world are liberals and socdems considered socialists?

seemed like a passive aggressive reminder of the com’s rules, since it was not meant as such but rather an honest expression of opinion, that liberals and so called social democrats could not be further away from socialism than conservatives.

Consider this: socialism (by it’s non-revisionist defenition) is the public ownership or democratic control over the economy by working ppl (instead of ppl who own for a living as it is now). Liberals and “socdems” have accepted the neoliberal economic base and have long given up on actually overcoming it. Unlike their openly reactionary or conservative counterparts (or rather brethren in defense of financial capital), however, they do a ton of virtue signaling and fluffy talking about how they’re going to fix things.
The Republicans act as the stick of capital, while the Democrats as it’s carrot.
From them you’ll get nothing but token concessions at best (like some of their domestic policies) and reactionary politics with a nice paint job at worst (like their foreign policies. They still have us imperialism at heart, even if they might put on a silk glove on the iron fist that the Republicans use, it hurts just as much in the global south).

To quote X:

The white liberal is the most dangerous thing in the entire wester hemisphere. He is the most deceitful, he’s like a fox. And a fox is always more dangerous in the forest than the wolf. You can see the wolf coming, you know what he is up to. But the fox will fool you. He comes at you with his mouth shaped in such a way, that even though you see his teeth, you think he is smiling.

All their supposed progress and opposition to capital only reinforces and propels capitalism, alleviating the need for fascism just for a little longer (which arises for the ruling classes when the majority of the population grows disillusioned with their lies, be they conservative or “progressive”). In the end only legitimizing the underlying framework, without ever threatening it.

Now don’t get me wrong, in the USA the dictatorship of capital reigns supreme and manifests in essentially two wings of the same party (“The United States is a one-party state, but with typical us opulence, they have two of them.”), swapping the mask of opposition every once in a while (good cop, bad cop). Under such conditions I also would vote for the Democratic party. However the apologetic attitude of “Vote for the Dems, it’ll gradually solve our problems and save our democracy from the reps”, which translates in all the agitprop efforts being put into electing one rich corrupt old man over another, takes energy away from the real socialist struggle: not fighting the symptoms, but taking the problem that is capitalism by the root and ripping it out. You can vote all you like, you will still live under dictatorship of capital…

As Berthold Brecht said:

Those who do not want to give up the private ownership of the means of production will not be able to get rid of fascism, but need it

In other words: fascism is a degenerated, protective form which capitalism relies on, when it can no longer fool the people and keep them docile with liberalism

(just to clarify on my use of quotes: I do not think of the people I quote as some form of authority to appeal to in mediation. It’s just when I remember what someone else has already put into words (much better than I ever could) smth relevant to the discussion, I like to use it directly and give credit (when I can remember who said it) instead of rephrasing it.)

---

tl;dr: the distinction between dems and reps is not one of “left/right” but rather one of “right/further right”. And the distinction between socialist on the one and liberals (and their socdem variety), revisionists, and outright reactionaries in a red coating on the other side, is not a case of leftist infighting but the distinction between the collaborators of capital and it’s enemy’s.
You can still vote for the Dems, just don’t waste your (and the peoples) energy one creating the illusion that they’ll be anything other but a temporary breathing stop in late stage capitalism’s road to fascism.

alsaaas, 29 days ago

I fail to see the contradiction tbh. It is precisely bc I am aware that the Dems are more progressive than the Republicans, that I said “I’d vote for the dems” (despite both of them serving capital).

And ofc the Dems are not leftists if we define the status quo as capitalism and leftism as the progressive opposition to the status quo (and those are the definitions I uphold).

Also I (unfortunately) am not posting from a socialist agitprop centre. I am under no illusion that my (shit)posts will destabilize anyone or anything. They are meant for other socialists and are a way of veting frustrations among other things.

tl;dr: one can recognize the Dems as the “lesser” of two evils, while still heavily criticizing the fact that the only choice is between two (or more under multi-part bourgeois “democracy”) evils in the first place…
“If voting changed things systematically, it would be illegal”

alsaaas, 29 days ago

It’s supposed to be funny bc the failed idealism of the Narodniks later lead to the individual terrorist approach of the “Narodnaya Volya” (“Peoples Will”)

(this is not meant to be a jab at anarchists btw, just thought it was midly relevant and funny/ironic)