fer0n

@fer0n@lemm.ee

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Sandbox-RPG Medieval Dynasty New Settlement is coming to Meta Quest (mixed-news.com)

Spectral Games will release a VR version of the PC game Medieval Dynasty New Settlement for Meta Quest 2, Quest 3 and Quest Pro in spring 2024. The VR version will include a new story and map. You will be able to build, cook, hunt, and farm in a medieval landscape. According to the developers, there will be two modes: a story...

fer0n,

On Quest at least you can return it up to 2h of playtime which should be enough to get a feel for the game

fer0n, (edited )

I occasionally feel the same way. However, I don’t think it’s a big issue to select the community first and then post to it instead of creating a post and selecting the community after. It’s the same amount of steps either way.

fer0n, (edited )

I’ve only played for about an hour so far. The haptics and intro sequences have been really nice, combat feels great (the little that I had). Definitely promising and reception in general seems to be very positive.

fer0n,

I’ve bought every walkabout map on day one except for meow wolf, but it seems like I’ll have to take a look after all

fer0n,

I thought long and hard about my top 10 so far and it’s actually quite difficult, there’s more games I’d like to add to it. This year‘s been really great overall.

Apart from Echo VR, whose main action was to get killed in August. It would’ve been my absolute number 1 for basically every year, I used to play competently and made a lot of good friends there.

But apart from that, this is the list I came up with:

  1. Dungeons of eternity (Quest)
  2. Resident evil 8 (PSVR)
  3. Synapse (PSVR)
  4. Gran Tourismo 7 (PSVR)
  5. Breachers (Quest)
  6. VR Skater (PSVR)
  7. Arizona Sunshine 2 (Quest)
  8. Assassins creed nexus (Quest)
  9. Ancient dungeon multiplayer (Quest)
  10. Puzzling Places multiplayer (Quest)
fer0n,

I‘m so looking forward to this, hopefully won’t be too long until it shows up on PSVR.

fer0n,

I thought it was already possible, but I guess I’m thinking of blocking communities

fer0n, (edited )

it’s Meta, so who cares?

Most people don’t care if it’s Meta, or what Meta even is. Also, Meta has by far the most VR users, and the Quest 3 is already one of the most used Steam headsets. The Quest line is the most relevant VR hardware out there.

the Zuckersphere is a horrible place

Probably in the future it will be, but not right now. Metas product lifecycle always starts out with being good to their users, which is where we are currently. The enshittification usually comes later. For some aspects (content and standalone) it’s basically the only option. If and when we reach that point there will hopefully be alternatives.

it’s still Vive or nothing

I’d love to have a Steam standalone headset, but it doesn’t exist (yet?) and the Vive is truly outdated by now. Not even bigscreen beyond or the index?

fer0n,

Sry, I‘m still not following. I don’t understand your argument, are you saying they want to federate to gain additional users to grab data from? Because I don’t think that’s going to be a significant amount of people.

Most people don’t care about what makes the fediverse desirable to its current users, all it does is add friction to them and therefore I don’t see it growing much either.

I think the reason why meta wants to federate is this:

  • it helps with anticompetitive arguments, because it’s “open” and not controlled by meta alone
  • some will refuse to use anything from meta, and threads users being able to communicate with them adds value
  • it won’t hurt meta, because the majority will be using their app anyways
  • it helps their image

I don’t think they’re doing it to “get more data” or to “take over the fediverse”. There’s nothing worth taking over and they can probably get the data anyways, it’s all openly available. So it’s basically all upside and no downside for them.

fer0n,

I think the reason why meta wants to federate is this:

  • it helps with anticompetitive arguments, because it’s “open” and not controlled by meta alone
  • some will refuse to use anything from meta, and threads users being able to communicate with them adds value
  • it won’t hurt meta, because the majority will be using their app anyways
  • it helps their image

I don’t think they’re doing it to “get more data” or to “take over the fediverse”. There’s nothing worth taking over for them currently and since most people don’t care about the fediverse I don’t see it growing much either. Although I’d certainly like it if that were the case.

They can probably get the data already, it’s all openly available. Federating it’s basically all upside and no downside for them, but it’s not exactly the biggest priority to implement it, it‘s going to take some time.

I’m not saying it might not have a negative effect or that they care a lot for what’s currently there. They’ll certainly want to monetize threads sooner or later.

fer0n,

It sounds a bit sarcastic, not sure if you mean it that way. One question: what privacy are you talking about with services that are meant to be entirely open? App analytics?

fer0n,

Active users went down, though. I don’t think mastodon is a big competitor for Meta, Twitter and TikTok are.

fer0n,

I have the same question. Lemmy and Mastodon are both public and as of yet, no one was able to tell me what “privacy” actually looks like for data in that context. Other than the fact that Meta will destroy it. It’s public, anyone can access it already.

fer0n,

What communities are you talking about specifically? I tried but I haven’t yet found a list of those that defederated preemptively. I can’t imagine it’s the majority of instances/users.

fer0n,

100% agree, I think most reactions here are blown way out of proportion even though I can relate to the general “fuck meta” attitude.

fer0n,

I think Bluesky is even smaller. It probably could’ve been a Twitter competitor before threads came around.

fer0n,

Look at the fediverse’s monthly active users, it’s declining. There’s a pretty solid wall of friction when trying to participate and the vast majority of people won’t ever be a part of it in its current state. There’s no upward tend here and I doubt that it’s ever going to be a real danger for meta.

fer0n,

While that’s true, I’m not sure how many people are using Mastodon that way and if that’s actually the main concern. In the end it still is meant to be a public platform. Not on the same level of “private messages and photos” where most people would probably be very concerned.

fer0n,

Of course cooperate social media isn’t the only harmful social media, if anything it might be the most civil one for its scale, simply because they’re trying to sell ads next to the content so the content can’t be complete garbage. They also have a bunch of other incentives that ultimately make it a shit experience for everyone, but there is an incentive to moderate.

Something to remember is that it isn’t the company producing the harmful content. It’s people.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • provamag3
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines