interolivary

interolivary, 7 months ago

Like, do you think that Kent state happening means Tiananmen didn’t happen or wasn’t actually bad because people on the other side of the world also did bad things, or what the hell was your point with this exactly? Or did you just like bang at the keyboard until a syntactically correct sentence accidentally formed?

interolivary, 7 months ago

Well I certainly didn’t before you mentioned it, but I can now practically hear his laconic voice read me the last two panels

interolivary, 7 months ago

honestly it feels like “being OK” and “producing art” don’t coincide all that often 😅

interolivary, 7 months ago

Oh you fucking tease, I hoped that that actually exists, but at least Beehaw’s community search gives me no results. WHY MUST YOU PLAY WITH MY HOPES AND DREAMS

interolivary, 7 months ago

https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/005b95c3-5abb-4937-9e16-59d262585677.webp

interolivary, 7 months ago (edited 7 months ago)

please apply a logistic transformation to your dates

Which is definitely a totally normal and everyday operation that normal people do with dates

interolivary, 7 months ago (edited 7 months ago)

I honestly don’t quite get why it’s so common to hate Javascript.

I mean, it’s not my favorite language to put it mildly (I prefer type systems that beat me into submission) but as far as popular dynamically typed languages go, it’s not nearly the worst offender out there. Yes, lol, weird things equal weird things when you use == but that’s not exactly unique among dynamic languages, and some people couldn’t come to terms with it not being like Java despite the name so they never bothered learning how prototypal inheritance works, and also who the fuck needed both null and undefined when either of those by itself is already a mistake and introducing them to a language should be grounds for a nice, solid kick to the groin.

But, warts and all, the implementations are generally reasonably performant as far as these things go, the syntax is recognizable because eg. braces are common whether we like them or not and notably also survives copy-pasting from eg. the internet or anything that doesn’t use the same whitespace you do, and it’ll happily let you write code in a quite multiparadigm way, leading to some people to insist Javascript is kind of like Scheme and other people to insist Javascript is nothing like Scheme.

So, shit could be worse. And by “shit” and “worse” I mean eg. Python, notable for achievements such as: being one of the first if not the first language with a designer who huffed enough solvents to think that semantically significant whitespace is a great idea especially combined with no real standardization on whether you need to use tabs or spaces, and which often doesn’t survive being copy-pasted from the web and is a nightmare to format; being unable to actually run anything in parallel up until very recently because lol why bother with granular locking in the runtime when you can just have one global interpreter lock and be done with it; or being popular in part due to the fact that its FFI makes it easy to write modules for it in languages that aren’t a crime against common sense and can run faster and more parallel than an 80’s BASIC interpreter. And let’s not even go into the whole “virtual environment” thing.

So while Python’s not quite INTERCAL-bad, at least INTERCAL doesn’t have significant whitespace and its manuals are really damn funny.

And then there’s eg. Ruby, with 9999 ways to do everything and all of them so slow that it aspires to one day be as fast as INTERCAL, and PHP which is a practical joke that went too far and somehow managed to eventually convince people it’s actually a real language.

edit: oh and if you don’t know about INTERCAL, I can highly recommend checking out the the C-INTERCAL revision’s manual, which includes eg. a very helpful circuitous diagram and a logical table to explain one of its more odd operators. There’s also a resource page that’s maintained by one of the perpetrators of the C-INTERCAL revision.

interolivary, 7 months ago

They should replace workers and people should deserve to live without being workers, but it should also be painfully obvious that our current economic system won’t support this idea, and won’t until we do some pretty drastic things.

It’s not that we couldn’t build a post-scarcity society probably even right now given some pretty radical adjustment of resource allocations, we just don’t want to build one – “we” being the 0.01% that have such insane amounts of wealth that they’ve essentially taken over the whole economic system, largely thanks to eg. dumb fucks like Reagan and sociopathic fucks like Thatcher and the people who idolize them buying into the idea that they too can be that rich because the wealth will somehow magically trickle down.

interolivary, 7 months ago

If you think this current brand of capitalism requires plebs to have money, I’m not sure how you explain the fact that when taking inflation into account wages have been either stagnant or actually going down ever since the 70’s / 80’s, the amount of wealth owned by the same plebs compared to the “financial ruling class” (mainly executives and such, and especially the banking sector thanks to deregulation) has shrunk dramatically, and cost of living keeps getting higher, while at the same time the compensation for the “financial ruling class” has grown at a frankly exponential rate.

Sufficiently advanced AI will, if anything, make it even more likely that that “ruling class” will realize they don’t need quite as many of us around because all we do us suck up their resources and complain how we haven’t eaten anything but cup noodles in a week and our teeth hurt.

interolivary, 7 months ago

That’s actually a bit tricky for me especially via text, I’ve got a touch of the 'ole autism (like I have an actual diagnosis from a real medical doctor and not TikTok), but I get what you mean. I have a bad habit of assuming the worst about people