upstream

@upstream@beehaw.org

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

upstream,

Chances are if you buy a high-end PC you’ll buy another one (or spend enough on upgrades to cost the same as another one) by the end of the console generation.

And let’s be honest. PC gaming has become ridiculously expensive due to first crypto and now AI.

I paid less for my Xbox Series X in October 2020 than I paid for my 3070Ti - which incidentally still costs more than when I bought it over a year ago.

Console games still cost an arm and a leg, and there’s only a handful of games I actually prefer playing on the couch with a controller, but given the inflated gaming pc prices it’s hard to argue that consoles are “as expensive”.

As a lifelong PC gamer I simply will not pay for online gaming, but Microsoft and Sony will continue to push in that direction as long as people let them.

upstream,

Good FCC.

pats head

upstream,

Traveling in the US it can often feel like everyone wants to scam you or take advantage of you if you don’t pay attention.

Heck, even store prices and restaurant prices aren’t the real price.

Store prices are without sales tax/VAT, and restaurants wants you to tip 20% so they can keep not paying their “employees”.

upstream,

No it isn’t. But companies are certainly trying to make it so.

upstream,

My thoughts exactly.

Followed by that moment from the Sonic movie (or trailer at least) - “how are you still alive?”

I have no idea

A decentralized, blockchain-based messaging network for safer communications (techxplore.com)

Researchers from several institutes worldwide recently developed Quarks, a new, decentralized messaging network based on blockchain technology. Their proposed system could overcome the limitations of most commonly used messaging platforms, allowing users to retain control over their personal data and other information they share...

upstream,

People are still looking for problems to which blockchain is the solution.

So far we’ve found none.

upstream,

Pretty sure the first guy trying to pitch money faced an uphill battle. But at least it was tangible.

upstream,

Most of what you describe is the inverse: Problems for which blockchain is the cause, or at least part of the problem.

That a speculative digital asset with no tangible value could perform better than other objects of investments, including currency, should not be surprising, that’s just group psychology and concerted effort to make people want to invest in intangibles.

Argentinian currency might be tangible, but its valuation isn’t.

upstream,

Best suggestion so far.

upstream,

The definition isn’t the problem. Git isn’t blockchain, never was, never will be. Thank god Linus

upstream,

Firefox never included an ad-blocker by default because an Ad-blocker kinda does the opposite of what the web-browser is supposed to do.

A web browser shall render the web page according to specification. Blocking content hinders this behavior and will even break some websites.

I think most people have forgotten that 15 years ago web browsers had barely started becoming standards compliant, with Opera being the first(?) to pass the Acid2 rendering test in 2006.

For reference: hyperborea.org/journal/…/opera-passes-acid2/

A user installing an ad-blocker is perfectly fine, and hopefully the user makes an informed decision of advantages and the possible disadvantages that said ad-blocker might have.

And it’s also fine for fringe browsers like Brave to have a default ad-blocker, but there’s a big difference from that to just putting one in a product that’s used by millions, even though most users would likely be happy with the change.

upstream,

Sure they could have.

But why would they?

Just because you, clearly, disagree with my opinion doesn’t make it terrible or senseless.

The strength of your conviction, or in which you convey it, isn’t a stand-in for rational arguments and logic based debate.

upstream,

He’s not saying Zoom is a bad product.

Teams and Zoom are great for remote work, and I get how a lot of people love just dialing in to meetings, but there’s definitely a different dynamic to being in the office.

During the pandemic my dev team grew from two people to six. Since it was in waves we got to try being at the office and being at home using remote work only interchangeably.

Especially as a manager I see the benefits of working in the office. Not necessarily every day, but regularly.

Not necessarily from a raw productivity perspective. The office has a lot of apparent drawbacks, but these drawbacks are what triggers the dynamic that makes the office better - at least for me and my team.

I find that the office conversations triggers more ideas and better collaboration.

With my manager hat on I find that it’s easier for me to see if I need to get involved in discussions or let people handle it themselves.

People are different, teams are different, but it’s not black and white.

People love the flexibility of remote work, and some people are certainly better off working “alone” at home than being with the team, but for me it’s all about finding the balance. I don’t want to micromanage anyone, but there’s a reason a lot of people need managers, and that is simply that left to their own devices they will start working on 200 things and not finish anything.

As boring as it is our job is to deliver value to the company.

But on occasion, I will let people run wild with ideas and see where it goes. And then rein them back in when there are deadlines to be met.

upstream,

Possibly an interesting catch-22 with regards to certain contracts’ requirements.

upstream,

We don’t even know if it’s coming, but now we’re speculating what titles it will launch titles? Oo

upstream,

My thoughts exactly.

13-14 years ago when smart phones were fairly novel people actually left meaningful app reviews.

Today people only bother if they’re discontent or lured into it.

upstream,

Image processing uses huge amounts of RAM. Regardless of who makes the software.

What do I need to do if I want to use my old 4th gen iPad in 2023?

I recently was able to get back my 4th gen iPad that I used for university and got excited to start using it again just for basic stuff like searching stuff on the browser, reading comics and such. However I quickly realized that I was unable to download anything from the AppStore as my iOS version is 10.3.4 and apps like...

upstream,

Stops you from upgrading to the new Home architecture though.

upstream,

I also did the same with movie journalists way back. Found their opinions rarely matched mine.

IMDb used to be a much better indicator, but after around 2010 where everyone suddenly started voting it got a lot more diluted.

It had obviously started on that trajectory before, but smartphones really catapulted it ahead.

Microsoft announces Python formulas in Excel... which have to get sent to the cloud (techcommunity.microsoft.com)

Since its inception, Microsoft Excel has changed how people organize, analyze, and visualize their data, providing a basis for decision-making for the flying billionaires heads up in the clouds who don't give a fuck for life offtheline

upstream,

Works for Microsoft and hates Python. Checks out at least.

IMHO opinions (read: “hard takes”) on popular and useful programming languages doesn’t have to be part of any disclosure, it just creates unnecessary drama.

At the end of the day programming languages are tools, and Python is a good tool. Part hammer, part Swiss Army knife.

Sure, you can grab your compressor, a hose and a nail gun, but the fact is that with Python I can process CSV documents that excel struggle to open in less time than it will take most people to setup a new project in Visual Studio.

I fully agree that running stuff in the cloud may be good for security, but it will probably also open the door for a number of security holes that may or may not be exploited before being patched.

Giving full access to random scripts on random people’s computers is begging for problems.

Sandboxing only works until there’s an escape. But IMO that should have been the target. Proper ground up sandboxing.

On the other hand - how on earth do you make sure that it’s escape proof? I certainly wouldn’t carry that responsibility.

If it’s Python or something else doesn’t matter, but Python certainly carries a lot of the “accessibility” that VB did way back when they made VBA.

Will be interesting to see what people make of it. And if they’ve managed to make the programming interfaces better than during the VBA era.

upstream,

If I misunderstood it’s probably because of the way you represented yourself.

Python packaging sucks, definitely, but saying you hate Python because packaging sucks (and you do it a lot) is bit like saying you hate the US because US immigration sucks (and you travel through immigration a lot).

Sure, you could hold the opinion, but I think most people would differentiate between the two positions.

However, kudos for working on OS! I’d give you a hug if I could!

upstream,

Indeed.

Not that it’s my field, but I wouldn’t be shocked if this has a lot to do with the human propensity to fall for religion.

Many humans actually have genetic traits that make them more likely to become religious [citation needed].

I suspect religion is interchangeable.

I recall a research case a decade or so back, where they took a huge Apple fan and showed him Apple logos and products while doing an MRI or something and his brain lit up the same way a religious persons brain would when you show them religious iconography, like a cross.

Some people are simply followers, doesn’t matter what.

Some people like to exploit that, such as Trump and Joe Rogan. Surprised they’re not peddling NFT’s and Crypto.

upstream,

Good. Seems I blocked enough Trump news not to notice :D

upstream,

I’ll make my own DNS, with blackjack and hookers! In fact, forget about the DNS!

upstream,

People seem to think that Rockstar milked it, and still is. Lots of paid content and P2W, if I’m not mistaken?

Personally only played online for an hour or two, I much prefer the single player experience, especially the story lines.

GTA V was great.

RDR2 was brilliant, a masterpiece.

If you want to hold grievances over rockstar it shouldn’t be milking a success, it should be how they treat their developers and content creators.

But that’s an industry problem, not something specific to Rockstar.

Personally I’m happy that they take the time to make these great games instead of rushing out a title every year like some companies do, but on the other hand it was really awesome how GTA III, Vice City, and San Andreas came out in rapid succession of each other and each game was bigger, better, and technically better than the previous one.

Then GTA IV and RDR came fairly quickly after that, then we got GTA V in 2013.

At some point the scope and ambition just got so big that these games now takes 8 or so years to make (RDR2).

I’m looking forward to GTA VI. And I would be surprised if it doesn’t break the $1 billion opening sale (3 first days) of GTA V.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • megavids
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines