@gws :thinking: it doesn't need to disassemble the whole thing just the symbol table and the page of code you're currently looking at, could be an interesting perf improvement to experiment with
Am I the only one who finds that the WASM spec takes a lot of effort to understand?
I've been able to find answers to my questions, but it has taken a lot more time and effort than I'd expect for something that feels like a straightforward and sensible design. The presentation feels needlessly convoluted.
I'd love a quick reference "green card" that lays out the bytecode and file format in the style of traditional CPU docs.
Only feedback after watching the vid: Please, don't let AI handle #a11y .. maybe take inspiration from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson (Google Doc ๐ฌ link at the bottom): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34612696