In this one, we have #Firefox adding some data collection (but it's fine, IMO), we have a ton of stuff happening around AI, and it's still an absolute nightmare, we have the Linux Kernel 6.9 (nice), and #France banning #TikTok in one of its territories, which alarmed a bunch of human rights / freedom associations:
@thelinuxEXP In defense of debian maintainer - i believe it's rational and good move (i mean default settings for keepassxc).
On my system, i have keepassxc (since i'm using this) compiled with no browser support, network support, autotype and other "crap" as he perfectly named.
"users" could learn how to compile packages with features they want.
This doesn't restricts any freedom, they just changed to better defaults.
If 'user' wants to take a risk, then that user should be on his own ... but seriously, that change was rational and good. If someone doesn't need security then... go ahead?
No one cares.
About tiktok, i don't use it and i do not provide data to China.
@sourcerer well, one would think that the point of a package is to avoid the burden of compiling for users. If your package makes 3/4 users compile something, you’ve kinda failed at packaging.
I also think that a password manager without browser support is pretty freaking usueless for most people, so, I guess we disagree on this :)
Add comment