breadsmasher

breadsmasher, 2 months ago

mEtA wOnT dEsTrOy ThE fEdIvErSe. wE sHoUlD lEt tHrEaDs In

breadsmasher, 5 months ago

Isn’t that literally in the constitution though?

The 13th Amendment, ratified in 1865, says: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Obviously slavery is horrific

breadsmasher, 1 month ago

Matthew Tuttle, chief executive of Tuttle Capital Management, says that management would be “stupid” not to issue new stock, even though the move will upset shareholders. “Whenever you see a stock jump, like you saw this jump, a secondary offering is always a risk,” said Tuttle.

Is this moron holding his chart upside down?

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/1a28b4f7-5692-4851-ab5f-f7f1833b0686.jpeg

breadsmasher, 7 days ago

Abbott’s decision comes after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles voted unanimously Thursday to recommend a full pardon and the restoration of firearm rights for Perry, who was sentenced last year to 25 years in prison.

Man gets convicted of murder.

Governor says “nah its cool, its not a crime suddenly” and gives him his guns back

Odds on when this guy murders someone else?

breadsmasher, 24 days ago

republicans would be happy with the appearance of democracy - just like russia. Theres multiple names on the box, but you know the votes aren’t counted. trump would conveniently win every time. Strangely just like putin does.

breadsmasher, 3 months ago (edited 3 months ago)

If trump is immune from all criminal charges for the sole reason of being, or having been, president, then this would apply to all current and future presidents.

If trump is immune, so is clinton, bush, obama and biden.

Presidents could have any political opponents assassinated.

By the time of the night of the long knives, hitler was effectively immune from all prosecution.

By the time of the soviet purges, stalin was effectively immune.

If this case allows a president complete immunity, its a huge step towards a dictatorship.

If presidents are immune, why would they ever give up power? Trump winning this case could mean he is never president again because biden could just, stop the election and purge anyone who challenges him.

breadsmasher, 5 months ago

Series of concessions and choices

Thats just life. But you made a number of poor concessions

breadsmasher, 24 days ago

Whenever I read about ceos making mass cuts across so many jobs, without a single thought for the individual person, it makes me consider what the ceo would be like if they ran a country.

Could you imagine a country where the leader suddenly decides to purge large numbers of their party?

Oh wait-

breadsmasher, 2 months ago

Bet this is solely because muski is upset people are still using Twitter instead of “x”

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

ill accept lower pay rises when I see lower profits, and CEOs refusing rises / giving back money to pay employees instead.

breadsmasher, 1 month ago

as well as a passage indicating that the party was also attended by a then-17-year-old woman who was previously the focus of a years-long Department of Justice probe which focused on whether Mr Gaetz had sexual contact with her

Standard conservative playbook.

breadsmasher, 1 month ago

average brexit voter

breadsmasher, 28 days ago

If they rule that a president is above the law, they are effectively creating a monarchy. All divine rights bestowed upon someone by virtue of existence.

Isn’t this one of the big reasons americans defend their rights to bear arms? To prevent/remove a tyrannical government?

breadsmasher, 26 days ago

Headline obviously bait to rile people up.

edit -

Ah. this is why.

mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-times/

Reasoning: Numerous Failed Fact Checks, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency

Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER

Factual Reporting: MIXED

Country: USA

Press Freedom Rating:** MOSTLY FREE**

Media Type: Newspaper

Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

both you and the people you are chatting with on Signal will need to be using the most updated version of the app to take advantage of them

If someone isn’t using the latest app, does this mean they will still be able to see any accounts phone number? I suppose if you don’t update, you can’t add anyone without knowing their beforehand anyway

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

Ban evasion?

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

Is your reddit account tied to your real life information? Why are you consulting lawyers for trolls taking the piss out of you on reddit?

breadsmasher, 4 months ago

you can have an unpopular opinion but your … colours … are showing through with phrases like Low Income, Poverty and Ghetto

breadsmasher, 7 days ago

You can’t fix the system when its working as intended. The system needs to be torn down and rebuilt

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

Everyone would love to have no meetings. But my job requires meetings. And I require a job to live in society.

Screensharing is useful to present information to an audience. There are alternative collaboration tools but I don’t see screensharing as a bad way to do this- use the right tool for the job.

Drawing up a system architecture? Use a whiteboard (digital or otherwise)

Presenting a powerpoint or whatever, like in a business update? Why wouldn’t you screenshare? The presenter wants to guide the audience through the information, to explain it. In the same way in person you don’t give everyone a powerpoint pack printed out to flick through, you display it and talk through it

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

yup this is a dumb opinion

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

Why are you targeting individuals just trying to survive instead of reporting corporations who hire illegally?

You are angry at the wrong thing. Take the boot of capitalism out of your mouth

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

The real goal of muski

warhammer40k.fandom.com/wiki/Servitor

breadsmasher, 3 months ago

You can’t ignore over 50 years of history beforehand, with a single sentence. Its vastly more nuanced than “blame hamas”