hfiwg

hfiwg, 1 month ago

Ich glaube mit ähnlichen Werten meint pumpkinseedoil Genozid.

hfiwg, 1 month ago

The straw that broke the camel’s back for me was the sign up form asking to paste a sentense from some communist (Marx?) book.

What do you think .ml abbreviates?

hfiwg, 2 months ago

From the reflection you can actually recreate what is behind the ball using this website.

hfiwg, 2 months ago

No need to deal with config files, you don’t know the location of. And I don’t know about i3 but many window managers use some really annoying configuration languages like xml.

hfiwg, 2 months ago

Also a product isn’t a bad product, just because it is produced under capitalism. A computers ability to compute does not depend on its mode of production.

hfiwg, 4 months ago

Es muss aber immer erlaubt sein den deutschen Staat und seine Organisationsweise zu hinterfragen oder sie ggf. abschaffen zu wollen. Natürlich steht das in Konflikt mit dem Selbsterhaltungszwang, dem jede Organisation unterliegt.

Wer zu voreiligen Schlüssen neigt könnte in diesem Widerspruch eine gewisse Parallele zum Toleranz-Paradox erkennen und darauf hin meinen, solche Hirngespinste dürften nicht zugelassen werden. Dem würde ich entgegen, dass die parlamentarische Demokratie und der Staat aber nicht eins ist mit der Freiheit, die sie laut vielen vertritt und, dass sie außerdem kein Selbstzweck ist. Sich von ihr zu entfernen könnte, aber muss also nicht eine Entfernung von der Freiheit bedeuten und auch nicht zwingend negativ zu werten sein. Der einzige Wert, den wir als Richtwert über allen anderen halten können ist also die “Freiheit” selbst, die aus verschiedenen Gründen - wahrscheinlich hat es etwas mit der Psychologie des Menschen zu tun - etwas positives ist.

hfiwg, 4 months ago

I hope you would agree, it is wrong to see people as totally atomized, neatly seperated, each in their own little castle with their own small set of things. We are all part of a World just as that World is part of all of us. Sometimes we make it a little better and sometimes we make it a little worse, but surely it is not as simple as to say anyone is the sole cause of their suffering nor, that they are the only recipient. For example: would it not be terrible for those, that love them to lose such a very dear peace of their world, and as an extension of themselves, even if it is in part responsible for their own demise?

You also mentioned natural selection, but it is clear, that not all thing one could label natural are good, just or desirable. ‘Can we perhaps even build a new nature?’, ‘In a world where we can sustain everyone, should we not just do it without any kind of selection?’ - those are just two questions, that come to my mind, but I don’t feel like thinking about them, still wanted to write them down.

hfiwg, 4 months ago

i do, they are so very interesting!

hfiwg, 7 months ago

Thank you! I’ll take a look.

hfiwg, 7 months ago

I suggest jwm!

hfiwg, 9 months ago

Gradual change sets the conditions for drastical change.