With U.S. democracy plagued by extremism, polarization, and a growing disconnect between voters and lawmakers, a set of reforms that could dramatically upend how Americans vote is gaining momentum at surprising speed in Western states.
🔸Ranked choice voting🔸, which asks voters to rank multiple candidates in order of preference, has seen its profile steadily expand since 2016, when Maine became the first state to adopt it.
But increasingly, #RCV is being paired with a new system for primaries known as 🔸Final Five 🔸— or in some cases, Final Four — that advances multiple candidates, regardless of party, to the general election.
Alaska, the only state currently using "RCV-plus-Final Four or Final-Five", appears to be seeing some benefits to its political culture already:
After years of partisan rancor, both legislative chambers are now controlled by bipartisan majorities eager to find common ground and respond to the needs of voters, say lawmakers in the state who have embraced the new system.
A slew of other states could soon follow in Alaska’s footsteps. Last year, #Nevada voters approved a constitutional amendment that would create an RCV-plus-Final-Five system — for the measure to take effect, voters must approve it again next year.
Efforts also are underway to get RCV-plus-Final-Five on #Arizona’s 2024 ballot, and RCV-plus-Final-Four in #Colorado and #Idaho — where organizers announced Wednesday that they’ve gathered 50,000 signatures (they need around 63,000 to qualify).
Even #Wisconsin Republicans, who in the redistricting sphere have fought reform efforts tooth and nail, in December held a hearing for bipartisan legislation that would create RCV-plus-Final-Five, though its prospects appear dim.
Meanwhile, #Oregon voters will decide next year whether to adopt RCV alone.
And this year, #Minnesota and #Illinois lawmakers passed bills to study RCV, while #Connecticut approved a measure that allows local governments to use it.
There are even flickers of interest at the #national level.
In December alone, two leading Washington, D.C. think tanks that often find themselves on opposite sides — the conservative 🔹American Enterprise Institute 🔹and the liberal 🔹Center for American Progress 🔹— each held separate panel discussions that considered RCV-plus-Final-Four/Five.
👉 Katherine Gehl, the founder of the 🔹Institute for Political Innovation, 🔹and the designer of the Final Four/Five system, calls RCV-plus-Final-Five “transformational.” (Her organization now says advancing five candidates to the general works best, by giving voters more choices.)
“There’s a huge pressure on reformers to say, this is not a silver bullet,” said Gehl. “And OK, I get that.”
But, she added, “I think it’s as close to a silver bullet as you can come.”
Add comment