ByrdNick,
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de avatar

Will physicians better categorize X-ray and ECG images if given more time per image?

Medical residents and staff viewed 50-100 images for 175 milliseconds to 20 seconds.

Neither viewing time nor experience seemed to be strong predictors of true positive and false positive categorizations.

Authors admit, "All viewing times in both studies were likely too brief to represent clinical practice."

https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15380

ttpphd,
@ttpphd@mastodon.social avatar

@ByrdNick

Why do this if it's not an ecologically valid test of praxis?

ByrdNick,
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de avatar

Hi, @ttpphd. I’m guessing that admission/realization was the result of peer review (after completing the study).

ttpphd,
@ttpphd@mastodon.social avatar

@ByrdNick ah ok fair enough. I've been there too

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Medicine
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • tester
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines