« As beautiful as code can be – regardless of your definition of “beautiful” – software is always somewhat defined by its utility. On the other hand, art exists per se, without any kind of intrinsic utility rather than its mere existence, and the sensations it generates […] A piece of #software, following this reasoning, must be useful, and hence is not actually #art.
But it might as well be classified as artisanal, in the sense that it conveys utility and beauty … »
Add comment