Just checked out the article and video. I’m a bit out of the loop, but the woman in the video says
Ms King-Slutzky said: “Nobody’s asking them to bring anything.
“We’re asking them to not violently stop us from bringing in [food and water]’’
Is this the hilariously mollycoddled part? The article makes it sound like the protestors want “to be fed”, but her quotes seem to suggest they just want to not be assaulted for bringing their own food? Or at least, asking for food they have already paid for to be provided? Can someone clear this up?
It just seems like any time some young liberal college students want to protest something (like a genocide), there’s an arsenal of right wing media out to make them look like morons. Sure, young people don’t always have their shit together, but as a country we should be in support of protests and protestors, even if we don’t agree with their message. Why shit on free speech?
Because Hamas hasn’t been a real threat in months. Israel has been the primary threat with their almost nonstop attacks since this war began, targeting of innocent civilians trying to get supplies, and intentional killing of children.
Hamas is horrible, but so are the actions of Israel’s military thus far.
It’s ok to be against both, but right now only one is political.
Also consider those protesting Israel’s actions don’t have an issue with their treatment of Hamas, but of the Palestinian people that are innocent and having to struggle to survive amongst this violence.
@BobaFuttbucker#Hamas is a threat as long as it exists. Are you thinking that if they are left alone, they will not recover and try to attack #Israel again? 😂 Or, is that what you are hoping will happen?
> Israel has been the primary threat with their almost nonstop attacks since this war began, targeting of innocent civilians trying to get supplies, and intentional killing of children.
Wait are you a conspiracy theorist who thinks #Israel is doing a genocide?
I love that your entire response hinges on not reading my comment about differentiating between Hamas and Palestineans, so either you didn’t read it prior to reacting or you have some issues with reading comprehension, so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and carry on with my life.
Moral decay does ultimately destroy society. Where people go wrong is when they demand their side be in power. It is possible to enforce moral standards without one side winning over others.
When people view the world through wijs and losses, who deciding who is a victim based who the person is and not due to actions, that can only produce evil. Enforcing strict morals does not favour anybody.
Add comment