cubers

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

threelonmusketeers, in [Mailday] QiYi M Pro, Sengso Master Pyraminx, Lanlan Rua

Hold up, LanLan mass produced the Rua? I know what I’m buying next.

narusite, in 34x34 Rubik's Cube [Matt Bahner]
@narusite@sh.itjust.works avatar

The video is really nice! Love the stop motion.

Zarxrax, in Learning F2L with my 3x3

You are faster with the layer but layer method because you are used to it and have practiced it a lot. Just keep working at f2l and you will get faster with it before long.

perishthethought,

Agreed. But how long? For you, I mean

Zarxrax,

I learned years ago, so I couldn’t tell you. But maybe about the same amount of time that it took me to get decent at layer by layer?

perishthethought,

Cool, cool. That’s what I’m hoping for…

perishthethought, in Monthly discussion thread (May 2024)

Hi y’all. Looking for true beginner YT channel recommendations please. 99% of what I find are channels which say they’re posting for beginners, but then make 12 turns in .5 seconds and say, “see?”. No dude, I could not see what you just did. Thanks!

thisisdee,

For YouTube channel, I generally find JPerm to be the clearest

Maybe PDFs/static websites would be better for you? Something like this. For me, especially once I get to learning OLLs and PLLs or any longer algs, it’s easier to just read rather than watch someone do it

perishthethought,

Great suggestion, thanks I’ll check all of that out

thisisdee,

Oh I just remembered, JPerm also has a website with written tutorials: jperm.net/3x3. I’m actually using it (jperm.net/algs/2look/oll) cos it lets you easily mark which ones you’ve learned or currently learning

narusite, in My new cubes
@narusite@sh.itjust.works avatar

Nice!

4x4x4 is the next logical step, but megaminx is actually easier: no new algorithm is needed (if you come from the “beginner method”). Figuring out all layers (except the last one) is pretty easy. Then I suggest you do some 3x3x3 algs to see what is affected. Anyway, that’s what I use too, no world record in sight either!

4x4x4 parity is the real hassle. I use commutators to remember it, and it’s pretty inefficient too :p

Where did you buy them?

perishthethought,

People keep saying that but I’m still struggling to map the f2l move to the 12 sides of this thing. It seems important the order in which I solve each pair. Plus just having the 12 colors to deal with, and I’m red green color blind. I need to spend more time with it still.

Speedcubeshop, online.

narusite,
@narusite@sh.itjust.works avatar

What I do is : insert corners first, then edges. Corners are easy. For edges, I do an insert “beginner”-style (URU’R’ U’ F’UF). (Since it can breaks the adjacent side, I pair the edge with the corner on a higher layer, that is doing 1 turn on the face). Just experiment with it, I’m sure it will “click” at some point ;)

atrielienz, in Monthly discussion thread (May 2024)

I haven’t memorized the algorithm for the 3x3. I just solve by muscle memory. Don’t know exactly what I should be doing to get better.

narusite,
@narusite@sh.itjust.works avatar

It depends on what better means for you. What’s your goal?

You can either check CFOP or Roux methods. Both are top-level cubing. CFOP is more algorithm oriented and might be closer to what you know, Roux is more “intuitive” with fewer algorithms.

atrielienz,

Well I suppose my goal is to get faster. But other than that I have no idea. But thank you for the advice. I’ll try one and see if it makes a difference.

thisisdee,

Just curious, how are you solving it right now? Is it beginner’s method?

atrielienz,

I downloaded the Rubik’s cube official guide and did the solve so often that I have just learned how to manipulate the cube from muscle memory. If asked to explain how to solve one I would not be able to. But if you hand me a cube I can do the necessary moves to solve it.

KammicRelief, in My new cubes

I have that same Megaminx, it’s a good one! I’m also not going for records etc. I don’t even time myself doing the mega – it’s more for stress relief when I don’t feel like trying to break my 3x3 records. I basically used a pdf of instructions to do the megaminx beginner’s method, until I had it memorized. It’s basically all F2L until you get to the top layer, then there’s a couple of simple algs (sune, etc.) to memorize to do the top.

JackGreenEarth, in My new cubes

What happened to the ‘Rubik’s’ part of the Rubik’s cube in this community name, description, and this post? Only seen it mentioned in one comment.

perishthethought,

Random Chinese companies started making better products than the Rubik brand. These newer alternatives turn much faster, are easily lubricated and so on. All of the world records are achieved with these improved models.

Edited a typo

Alexstarfire, in My new cubes

1x1x1, finally a rubik’s cube I can solve.

Frozzie, in My new cubes
@Frozzie@lemmy.world avatar

This megaminx is a classic

Cenzorrll, in My new cubes

My tip for the megaminx is that all the algorithms are the same as the 3x3x3, they just go off at weird angles. If you can keep your focus on a corner and treat it like a 3x3x3 you should be good. The last layer is odd to get the edges, I use the same algorithms, but the patterns to look for are different and the edges move a little differently since there’s an extra edge that moves around. The corners are pretty easy in the middle portions, so I just put them in place while being careful about the completed parts.

perishthethought,

I think i get what you mean but I have trouble with 3D modeling in my thinking (which is why I started cubing). Thanks for this idea in any case

JohnDClay, in My new cubes

Nice! I’m in the same camp, just for fun.

SpaceNoodle, in My new cubes

That one’s a dodecahedron

narusite, in Monthly Discussion Thread (April 2024)
@narusite@piaille.fr avatar

A lot of WR that I missed:

  • 4x4x4 15.83 single by Max Park
  • 7x7x7 1:39.68 avg by Max Park
  • FMC 20.00 avg by Wong Chong Wen (黄崇文)
  • Clock 2.40 single, 2.52 avg by Eryk Kasperek
  • Megaminx 23.18 single by Leandro Martín López

Not a WR but CR : 3x3x3 4.84 avg by Tymon Kolasiński (WR-2 tie with Ruihang Xu (许瑞航))

narusite,
@narusite@piaille.fr avatar
threelonmusketeers, in Monthly Discussion Thread (April 2024)

I recently got a second RS3M 2021, and discovered that my original one was in fact not an RS3M 2021 at all.

Any tips for identifying what I have?

It’s MoYu brand, magnetic (but not maglev), very light, with a shiny surface finish.

thisisdee,

Maybe an older RS3M? How is it different than the RS3M 2021 that you got?

threelonmusketeers,

I don’t think it is an older RS3M, as I have (I think) every cube in that series, and it doesn’t match the MF3, MF3S, MF3RS, MF3RS2, RS3, RS3M, and RS3M 2020. I suppose there is always a chance that one of those could be wrong too, but I think they matched the pictures on the boxes.

Any other MoYu 3x3s it could be?

thisisdee,

Unfortunately I’m not very familiar with all of MoYu’s line. If the logo on the cube is exactly the same then I would guess it’s one of the MF3RS series as their WRM ones usually have different logo. But other than that, I have no idea.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • cubers@lemmy.world
  • thenastyranch
  • DreamBathrooms
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • kavyap
  • ngwrru68w68
  • megavids
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines