I wonder what salary the newly appointed CEO gets. Is it disgustingly much, like with Mitchell Baker or did Laura Chambers get a raise for taking the reigns?
Baker have drained Mozilla for all she can without completely ruining the brand name and now there’s somebody else’s turn.
The only reason I went from Brave to LibreWolf was the damn AI bullshit. Firefox as a browser is subpar in all aspects beside being open source and not fucking about with AI. I guess they lost the “don’t fucking about with AI” lead and is now competing on a technical level with chromium browsers.
And why do all serious companies go for the chromium engine instead of gecko? Because it’s better.
Brave isn’t trustworthy at all. They have all that scammy crypto shit, replace ads with their own ads instead (which is trash because they were misleading people and pretending it was helping folks) and used to append Amazon links with their own referral code automatically.
I couldn’t find any kind of history of tech bubbles that wasn’t pro-bubble. Going backwards: “AI”, VR, Blockchain/Crypto, …, Dot Com bubble? I feel like there have to be more examples in there that I’m missing.
The dotcom bubble is a good example of a bubble that’s different from VR and crypto.
Massive investments, lots of dumb projects, the underlying tech (the web) still finds widespread use and past the bubble, the dotcom projects that survived are still a massive industry
People think bubbles necessarily collapse to zero because that’s what web3 did. It just means the market is inflated
Most of the times they have some value under the hype
Heh. I noticed in the article that Mozilla is regretting betting heavily on VR. Good thing they’re moving those resources into something sure to win, like AI.
"Since early 2023, we have experienced a shift in the market for 3D virtual worlds. With the exception of gaming, education, and a handful of niche use cases, demand has moved away from 3D virtual worlds. "
Who could have predicted that AI VR, while potentially compelling in the long term, was, in the current form, just a fad, in 2024 2014?
A bunch of us did, but we were told we didn’t understand how truly revolutionary the technology was.
LLM AI is a fad, but not the same kind of fad as VR. It doesn’t need to be integrated into everything, but the technology has genuine utility and will not be going away.
I think the trend for “AI in everything” is stupid, yet I’m running a Vscode plugin that integrates local LLM models and it’s very useful.
This is the same sort of thing that can be useful in a browser too. The web is so spammy these days that feeding it to an LLM to summarize and filter it is a legitimate use case.
So, the consumer tech industry relies on hyping up technologies and blanket applying them EVERYWHERE in order to get investor funds. That’s literally the reason why. There’s investor money in AI and there’s also money to be made by lying to people and having them pay for AI-based services.
The answer, as always, is capitalism.
When we’re off this AI hype train, keep an eye out for what the “next big thing” is according to techbros and examine it very critically.
It's not just about AI in Firefox, but rather making an open-sourced AI in general. The world is absolutely heading towards AI integrations being normal; personally I'm glad we've got Mozilla working on an AI rather than being limited to closed-source AIs made by for-profit companies.
This is basically how I see it. Whether we like it or not, its happening. Claiming it won't at this point is just as silly as all the people who claimed the internet was just a fad.
Better to have options, long as it's optional I don't have many issues with it.
Now if it's rammed down our throats, that's an entirely different story.
Add comment