The teams are too greedy for that sponsorship money so they block competitors
F1 is too expensive. They need to massively LOWER the budget, stop the revenue sharing and double the number of teams.
Also get rid of the stupid hybrid and go back to V8 or V10. Tone down the emphasis on aero and make cars that are raceable without all the aero tricks.
F1 is boring. I only watch old F1, pre hybrid days and nothing else.
What’s the shortest start/finish straight on the calendar? The only real limit to the number of teams in my mind comes purely from how much longer the cars are that at a certain point the grid has to wrap around the final turn. I don’t think we’re anywhere near that on any of the current tracks, though.
Is there any particular reason or regulation why the F1 races couldn’t use a running start like other categories? Where everyone departs from the pits at fixed intervals and then the race starts after a 0 lap. Is the grid start from standstill mandatory?
Standing starts are almost as integral to the identity of F1 as open wheels are. Right or wrong, F1 is almost certainly never going to switch to rolling starts.
Presumably you’d get less wheel-to-wheel racing, and considering that most recent rule changes have been in pursuit of more of that, it seems unlikely they’d take a course that resulted in less.
I don’t particularly want it one way or the other. I was genuinely asking since I don’t know a lot about the sport. I find it all boring and lame regardless but I’m open to learn and appreciate. But nobody seems to fucking know or care enough to answer the question. And just down votes, I suppose out of an imaginary insult or slight implied by the question.
Add comment