Deceptichum,
@Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works avatar

The article has no mention of criminalising AI generated porn, only deepfakes?

roastedDeflator,
roastedDeflator avatar

To my understanding it does?

The proposed rules will criminalize the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including deepfakes made by AI tools, which could help deter revenge porn. Cyber-stalking, online harassment, misogynous hate speech and "cyber-flashing," or the sending of unsolicited nudes, will also be recognized as criminal offenses.

Deceptichum,
@Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works avatar

Where does it mention AI generated porn in that? AI generated deeepfakes, sure but not catch-all AI porn.

For example if someone made some AI hentai porn, what part of that sentence would imply that’s going to be criminalised, because I can’t see it in there.

nevernevermore,
nevernevermore avatar

I think it’s more about the “non-consensual” part of the first sentence in the article. Ai generated porn of nobody in particular=probably fine. Ai generated porn of a real life person=probably unethical.

roastedDeflator,
roastedDeflator avatar

I think I see your point. It looks like this proposal is related to humans specifically, not artwork.

NoLifeKing,

AI porn is literally a new image, its not a deep fake.

Deep fakes are made to look like a specific person, normal AI porn does not.

sharkfucker420,
@sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml avatar

deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • goodnews
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • JUstTest
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines