haskman, 17 days ago

Since the #Moonbit #JavaScript backend post (https://www.moonbitlang.com/blog/js-support) is trending, I thought I'd compare #PureScript backend optimizer (https://github.com/aristanetworks/purescript-backend-optimizer) output to see how it fares. The results were pretty good!

With basically this PureScript code -

run = fromArray  
 >>> flatMapF (fromArray <<< _.members)  
 >>> filterF _.gender  
 >>> mapF (\x -> min 100 (x.score + 5))  
 >>> mapF grade  
 >>> filterF (_ == 'A')  
 >>> foldF (\_ x -> x+1) 0  

the benchmark results are as follows. PureScript is roughly 6x faster than plain JS, and 6x slower than Moonbit output ( -

┌─────────┬──────────────┬─────────────┬────────────────────┬──────────┬─────────┐  
│ (index) │ Task Name │ ops/sec │ Average Time (ns) │ Margin │ Samples │  
├─────────┼──────────────┼─────────────┼────────────────────┼──────────┼─────────┤  
│ 0 │ 'Moonbit' │ '34,67,542' │ 288.38869989829305 │ '±0.06%' │ 1733772 │  
│ 1 │ 'Plain Js' │ '74,816' │ 13365.983827421464 │ '±0.54%' │ 37409 │  
│ 2 │ 'Kotlin Js' │ '1,90,241' │ 5256.474017304151 │ '±0.38%' │ 95121 │  
│ 3 │ 'PureScript' │ '4,99,456' │ 2002.1768597161156 │ '±0.70%' │ 249729 │  
└─────────┴──────────────┴─────────────┴────────────────────┴──────────┴─────────┘  

#FunctionalProgramming #Frontend #Benchmarks