@mihailim@metin@tomcapuder I agree with Tom and Mihai. The fine-tuning argument is an old one, and I think some people want to read more into it than there is. The chances of winning a lottery are astronomically small, yet it happens surprisingly often.
However, the article is interesting as a philosophical discussion. Physics and philosophy are by definition complementary; physics is the testable part, philosophy the untestable part.