And now that we’ve heard from an expert in the field, for balance let us now give equal attention on the matter to a moron who is in no way qualified to comment.
There is a reason why in courts of law, experts that are called on to testify over facts in front of people who are not experts on the fact have to bring their curriculum vitae and their resume and provide sources to prove how they are experts in this field.
Because I know I can talk about just about any topic and sound like I know what I'm talking about when I really don't and if I can do it I'm willing to bet half the rest of the world could do it too.
I would love to actually see debates between experts in the field on topics that I know little about but I don't know a good place to find that kind of quality content.
Like here's a good one, how does magnetism work?
Like, I'm cut above some people in that I understand that it has to do with the field alignments of the electrons in ferromagnetic particles, and how when those particles are in the correct alignment the electromagnetic fields of each individual atom end up amplifying each other, standing on the shoulders of giants, one wave sitting on top of another wave sitting on top of another wave where their peaks keep adding up.
Great. I got that much.
But what is it about that that causes them to draw one another together? What is it about them that causes them to induce electron movement and electromagnetic braking force in semi-ferromagnetic materials? I don't know. I would love to hear experts tell me the things that I don't know about and to tell me where the current points of disagreement are based on the best measurements that we've been able to take so far but I do not know where to go to find that information.
I'd like to have a "debate" about whether Joe Rogan is an alien pedophile zombie. Is he? Has anyone shown any real evidence contradicting this? Who knows what he's doing behind closed doors? I don't, can you really say for sure that you do either?
I'm not accusing him of anything, I'm just asking questions. I'm just tryin to have a conversation here.
All the people are saying it, I’ve heard Joe Rogan is an alien pedo too. There’s no way that many people are talking about it for it not to be true. I heard, though, he might actually be a vampire and not a zombie, hmm, curious.
I mean, there is no smoke without fire right? It’s literally impossible that all of those people say this and there is no truth behind it even if just 50%, right? I don’t know anything about it, so I’m not accusing him of anything but you have to admit it’s weird! Why would people say this if it’s not true. And don’t tell me the « experts » are saying it’s not true, they are all biased with a vested interest… unlike all those random ass people saying he is a pedo. Really makes you wonder, but I’m not an expert so I’m not directly accusing him, I’m just asking the question because I’m a coward…
Look at what happens when you ask DallE to create an image of Joe Rogan as an alien pedo zombie.
If this not a clear case of deep state censorship then I don’t know what is. And the cover-up goes all the way up to OpenAI and Microsofoft. They clearly don’t want us to know the truth.
Never cross swords in the Devils house, for he will always have the upper hand. Let Joe go argue with his reflection in some mirror. That way he can be of equal standing
not how science debates work though, scientists don’t get on stage to defend their “stance” on something. They write a paper containing all of their hypothesis and the tests they use to test said hypothesis and the conclusion of what exactly those tests prove. Debate has very little place in the real of science, because science actually is black and white. Something is true or false and has defined values that cannot be debated away.
Edit: When a scientist doesn’t believe what another scientist has purported to be true, it is then his responsibility to evaluate the testing methodology and either find a test that disproves the first guy’s theory, or a way to prove that his tests simply didn’t prove what he says they did.
What is really driving me crazy about this whole situation is that people keep calling Peter Hotez, a man who helped develop a patent-free, easy-to-manufacture vaccine so poor countries can protect their people from COVID and he’s being accused by Rogan bros of being in the pocket of “Big Pharma.” How the hell do major pharmaceutical companies benefit from a patent-free vaccine?
Hotez should be hailed as a hero. Instead, he’s being dragged through the mud because he won’t get into a shouting match with RFK Jr. on Rogan’s show.
Politics aside, why debate Joe Rogan about vaccines? He’s not a scientist, he’s an entertainer. I don’t get my medical advice from a person without trained medical knowledge. I wouldn’t take mechanical advice from someone who’s not a mechanic or works heavily with cars in their freetime, that’s how you can mess up your car. Why would this be different? People need to stop giving his opinions so much value when he has zero related education/experience to back them up…
Rogan doesn’t want to set up a debate. There won’t be an impartial moderator or uninterrupted statements and rebuttals. As Hotez says, Rogan wants the Jerry Springer Show. That’s what gets him listeners. A formal, dry debate about science is not something RFK Jr. is capable of or Rogan is interested in.
Ignore that willfully-ignorant, idiotic toxic meathead. Don't give him any more misguided perception of legitimacy in the public sphere. Not a shred more.
Please, don't bite the hook, you WILL empower him. You cannot win, and he cannot lose, in the minds of his horde of dittoheads.
Add comment