Brahm1nmam

@Brahm1nmam@lemmy.sdf.org

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Brahm1nmam, (edited )

not how science debates work though, scientists don’t get on stage to defend their “stance” on something. They write a paper containing all of their hypothesis and the tests they use to test said hypothesis and the conclusion of what exactly those tests prove. Debate has very little place in the real of science, because science actually is black and white. Something is true or false and has defined values that cannot be debated away.

Edit: When a scientist doesn’t believe what another scientist has purported to be true, it is then his responsibility to evaluate the testing methodology and either find a test that disproves the first guy’s theory, or a way to prove that his tests simply didn’t prove what he says they did.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • kavyap
  • JUstTest
  • modclub
  • ethstaker
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • tester
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines