The Court seems to have spelled out a clear way forward for climate cases - and confirmed that climate change is very much an ECHR issue,” she writes from Strasbourg, while live-tweeting the hearing on X.
A basis for the ruling was a breach of art 8 of the Human Rights convention"
“Today, the Strasbourg Court declared that Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights encompasses a right to effective protection by the state “from the serious adverse effects of climate change on lives, health, well-being and quality of life”.
It found that the Swiss Confederation had failed to comply with its duties under the Convention concerning climate change.”
I just hope this ruling, and future ones, will be used on a wise and right way. I mean one could rule that a certain country hasn’t been upholding its own climate targets which sounds fair enough; it seems more or less measurable, accountable and executable.
I imagine that Switzerland will have to adjust its environmental policies to match their climate quotas.
'Panama Papers' trial starts. 27 people charged in the worldwide money laundering case (apnews.com)
Top European court rules human rights violated by climate inaction (www.euronews.com)
The Court seems to have spelled out a clear way forward for climate cases - and confirmed that climate change is very much an ECHR issue,” she writes from Strasbourg, while live-tweeting the hearing on X.