@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

MisterFrog

@MisterFrog@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

This and the worse right-click menu make me dread the day I have to switch at work :/

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

(Below is my opinion, I respect you have yours, and I’m not having a go at you. I just want to take part in the discourse friendo!)

To me, if they wanted to store it in my area by encasing it now (or, any time in like the last 40 years), I wouldn’t mind either.

The issue that isn’t fear-mongering that people continually overlook because of all the knee-jerking people lamenting that it’s “unsafe”, is that we then have to maintain containment for thousands upon thousands of years.

That’s the issue, permanent storage, not all the temporary storage that is happening now.

Nuclear is not a great solution to immediately reducing emissions, in my opinion. Takes way too much capital and way too much time to get operational. Don’t close still operating plants, but damn, we need to be building the fastest shit possible, right now. Not something that takes a decade to build. We have solutions ready, governments just aren’t getting their act together and build it. Even if the business-case doesn’t make complete sense; we don’t have time.

Sand batteries, liquid air energy storage, lithium ion batteries, flow batteries, (plus a bunch of other contenders) they’re all immature technologies but they do work right now, anywhere, no terrain for pumped-hydro required. Sure they’re not very efficient, or have crap lifespan in the case of Li-ion, but solar plants literally aren’t being built in some places because prices go negative during the day, and plants are being curtailed.

We need to build storage, now, even if it’s not a silver bullet. And we can’t wait for expensive-as-fuck nuclear.

Someone should call me when we decide re-enriching spent nuclear fuel is fine and we can do nuclear waste recycling, actually getting our money’s worth. Or when thorium gets good.

My personal opinion conclusion:

  • Nuclear waste is not immediately that concerning for safety, it’s the fact we’re signing up to store it for longer than recorded history.
  • It’s expensive and takes to long to build
  • The technology needed for the energy transition already exists
  • Also agree, that turning off operating nuclear doesn’t make sense.

Thanks for reading, looking forward to hearing people’s thoughts.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

“He or she” sounds and looks so cumbersome. “They” is the superior pronoun on style/conciseness alone.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Yup, either singular or plural. It’s clear from context because you always refer to them in a previous clause. The user did this, they… The class did this, they…

The user must do this before first use, if he or she fails to… Ugh

The user must do this before first use, if they fail to…😘👌

They has been used like this for a long, long time.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

I think it’s naive to think that the imperial core will stop with the needless wars simply because oil is no longer the hot commodity. There’s always perverse interests to use the military for power projection and resource control.

Under your current voting system, this will never change.

I for one, refuse to be shipped off in our generation’s tribute to America. Our government (Australia) is still the US’ vassal state.

MisterFrog, (edited )
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Thank you. This is such a breath of fresh air. In all cases I prefer a simple answer, when organising an event with multiple people where I want to get ideas on numbers for planning.

• Yes - great! See you there

• No (with or without a reason) - fantastic! We’ve all got our own stuff going on or reasons why we don’t want to go!

• Maybe, with a reason why, or when you would be able to give an answer - cool!

• Maybe, with no further explanation - ugh. I’ll just assume you’re not coming and don’t care.

Maybe with no explanation is the cowards way out. Especially when “no sorry, I’m busy!” is the standard white lie.

“No because I don’t want to (don’t feel socially up to it)” is the hero’s response and I salute you 🫡

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Here’s the trick (maybe): “Don’t you know that WhatsApp is owned by Meta and collecting information on your chat metadata (who you chat to, when, your contacts, their contacts).”

Tell them to get Signal. If there’s any country on this planet where convincing people to use Signal is easier, it must be Germany. GMaps streetview was banned there until recently, everyone uses fake names on Facebook, if they even made one in the first place.

Surely they must be amenable to Signal

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

I just hopped to another launcher by total coincidence a couple of weeks ago. This is welcome news

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

TotalLauncher

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Journalists barely cite anything. “A study from this organisation says this.” Don’t tell you when it was published, or link to the official website. Nada.

Journalists are pretty trash at citing their sources on average. I think it’s wild most countries don’t seem to regulate this. It would do wonders for archives of news content so that you can actually follow up on the story to it’s source.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Because it makes getting an intuitive sense of what solar time it is somewhere harder.

Can I call my grandma in a different country? Hmm what time is average midnight there. Okay 8 (so far, same thing as looking up a timezone), and it’s 18:00 now, so 10 hours after midnight, which is like my 23:00. Needlessly complicated with extra steps for the average person.

Sure, you can say, I’ll call you X and that will mean the same thing everywhere, but does not have any information about solar time. And these days, it’s automatically converted if you use a calendar (which you should). This is the point of programming, to make the USERS life easier, not the dev. The end is more important than the means, I think we can agree.

Or: what time is it where my grandma is? Okay, cool, I have a sense of what that is immediately after knowing the answer.

There are reasons we do things this way. Working roughly to solar times has more benefits than being able to say a time and it mean the same moment everywhere.

I say we leave things the way they are, works okay.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Could you elaborate a little, I’m not quite sure how it’s related to timezones

MisterFrog, (edited )
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Which I think we can all agree is more work than what we currently need to.

It’s not just one addition, it’s 2 operations following knowing what time midnight is to understand what the solar time it is: what time is it now, minus what time is their midnight, and then you have to add that back to what your midnight is to get a sense of the time. Or you just start thinking in solar time WHICH IS WHAT WE ALREADY DO.

That’s 2 calculations. Currently we do 0.

Innately knowing what time means in films, talking to people over the phone, going to a new country. It would be a huge pain in the arse.

"They met up at 13:00“ great. So where are they in this film? Forcing exposition where currently you might let it be vague.

People who advocate for one timezone simply haven’t thought it through.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

The state (could and idealistically) be the will of the people via proper democratic systems. It’s just that right now most aren’t that democratic, and unelected corporations have too much influence. (So under capitalism, I do think actual democracy isn’t super meaningful)

I think if you want to have a functional civilisation (rather than just small communes, which with today’s population is a pipe-dream) you need some kind of taxes, and now we’ve already arrived back at needing a state.

Collective spending is required for a civilisation, end of story. Anarchy is never going to build continent spanning infrastructure, ever.

Someone trying to accumulate wealth or power is going to ruin it for you. Sold you food with lead in it? Okay, what are ya gonna do about it? At a small, community scale this is easy, at civilisation scale, forget about it. You need some court system.

If you want to go live in a commune, be my guest, that’s the only place anarchy can work.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Care to elaborate on what you felt was offensively fucking wrong?

You agree with walkable cities but:

  • Want large houses (needing more space, spreading things out)?
  • Don’t want denser zoning?? (How are ya gonna walk somewhere with everything spread out)
  • Hate the idea of a corner shop. (Love driving just to get a few small food items)
  • Dislike taxes (how will you pay for your infrastructure? There’s a reason US cities are crumbling, they’re too spread out, so land taxes don’t cover the maintenance bills)
  • Like carparks
  • Hate bikes
MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

She is peak wholesome+handsome content. The fun she’s having decimating those logs is infectious.

Quality recommendation 👍

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

I love spreadsheets (hey, we all have our weird interests) so at first thought this was an ASD meme.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Loving spreadsheets isn’t something everyone with ASD loves, and I didn’t mean to imply that, just the hyper-fixated interest (8 hours) on a something which I personally happen to love.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

You can get your sex changed on your birth certificate in NSW according to Wikipedia. Not a lawyer, but I’m gonna guess the app is shit-out-of-luck on this one if their birth certificate indicates they’re a woman.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Drives me up the wall when people talking “oh it’s all just revenue rasing!” No, it’s no where near harsh enough.

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

Oh apologies, I’m with you on small offences like you mentioned.

It’s mostly when people seem to get mad at the existence of speed cameras at all.

We’re not as car-brained as the US, but heck, I think people forget we’re piloting something quite heavy at speed, and it should be respected accordingly.

If what you mentioned is true, then that’s nuts. Surely there should be jail time and permanent bans for wreckless driving, even if it’s a first offence, right?

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

It depends what it is. There are some things better reserved for a call, where tone of speech can be heard.

I’m glad to not have quite this level of social anxiety, sounds really not fun for the suffer :(

MisterFrog,
@MisterFrog@lemmy.world avatar

eSIMdb is good place to find even more options :)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • kavyap
  • JUstTest
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines