@Wilshire@lemmy.world avatar



This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

The NYPD's Public Relations Staff has More Than Doubled in the Past Two Years (nysfocus.com)

In a statement, Brooklyn Councilmember Lincoln Restler pointed to the contrast between the dcpi’s staffing surge and Mayor Eric Adams’s cuts to other city services, including hundreds of layoffs in the Department of Buildings. “It’s stunning to see the nypd Communications Department more than double to 86 staff while so...

@Wilshire@lemmy.world avatar

Move them to PR so they can’t cause more PR problems. Brilliant idea.

@Wilshire@lemmy.world avatar

I asked ChatGPT for a response to your comment

Your comment raises several interesting points regarding the use of voice likeness and the legal implications of hiring voice actors who sound similar to well-known celebrities. Let’s break down the key issues:

  1. Use of a Similar Voice: The core of the debate revolves around whether using a voice that sounds like a well-known celebrity constitutes a legal issue. If the voice used is indeed not Scarlett Johansson’s but merely resembles it, this might not be inherently illegal. However, it could still lead to legal disputes over rights of publicity and potential misrepresentation.
  2. Voice Acting and Vocal Qualities: It is true that many voice actors can mimic the vocal qualities of celebrities. Hiring a voice actor who naturally has a similar voice to a celebrity is a common practice. The legal line is crossed if the intent and execution imply endorsement or use of the celebrity’s identity without permission.
  3. Rights of Publicity: Celebrities, including Scarlett Johansson, have rights of publicity, which protect against unauthorized commercial use of their name, likeness, and other identifiable aspects of their persona. If the resemblance is close enough that it creates confusion or implies endorsement, it could be grounds for a lawsuit.
  4. Potential for a Lawsuit: Whether Scarlett Johansson would win a lawsuit depends on several factors, including the jurisdiction’s specific laws on rights of publicity, the exact nature of the voice usage, and whether it can be proven that the voice model intentionally mimics her voice in a way that exploits her identity.
  5. Practical Examples: Your analogy with James Earl Jones highlights a key point. If a voice actor is hired for their natural resemblance to a well-known voice, it’s typically acceptable. However, explicitly marketing or promoting the voice in a way that suggests it is the celebrity without their consent could lead to legal challenges.

In summary, while it may not be outright illegal to use a voice that sounds like a celebrity, there are significant legal nuances and potential for litigation if the use implies unauthorized endorsement or exploits the celebrity’s identity. The balance lies in how the voice is marketed and whether it misleads the audience into believing it is the celebrity.

@Wilshire@lemmy.world avatar

That was the point.

@Wilshire@lemmy.world avatar

The price tag, the letter adds pointedly, will be “expansive."

I read that as “expensive”, with a country twang.

@Wilshire@lemmy.world avatar

If the radio isn’t working, the helicopter and the occupants were probably lost.

@Wilshire@lemmy.world avatar

Over 30 Mexican political candidates have been killed in this campaign season.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Durango
  • normalnudes
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • tester
  • cubers
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines