@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

ada

@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Admin of lemmy.blahaj.zone

I can also be found on the microblog fediverse at @ada or on matrix at @ada:chat.blahaj.zone

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Basically you could be a whole lot more corporate sterile about this messaging.

This is exactly what I’m trying to avoid. I am wearing my heart on my sleeve by choice.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Of course it’s an emotional one. I have no desire to downplay that and pretend that my response was dispassionate. It very much was not

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Their sidebar rules actively allowed “childlike” content before this occurred.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The ones the lemmynsfw admins posted are accurate.

This post isn’t for the Fediverse, it’s an announcement to the users of Blåhaj as it impacts their experiences here.

I don’t intend to get in to he said/she said over it with the wider Fediverse

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Thanks :)

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

but I personally don’t think the original incident was that big of a deal

The post I saw looked like an underage teenage girl. It was reported as child porn and looked like it to me before I even looked at the community.

Then when I looked at the community, I discovered it wasn’t accidental. The whole point of the community is to appeal to folks looking for people that look like underage teenagers.

That’s a pretty big deal.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I understand this post isn’t directly related to me as I don’t view on this instance

And yet you still thought you’d throw your hat in the ring

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Believe it or not, I agree. It’s one of the reasons why I moderate less aggressively on lemmy than I do on the rest of the fediverse. I block/ban users here, for things I would defederate instances over on our main instance.

But images that look like CSAM are something else again. I’m not going to give leeway to spaces like that. I don’t want to be anywhere near NSFW content that can be mistaken for CSAM. I don’t want to moderate around it, I don’t want to navigate the legalities, and I don’t want to be connected to a community that attracts folk looking for porn like that.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The community in question used “child-like” in their sidebar to describe their acceptable content, and the first post I saw in a report looked like CSAM.

That, and other random photos of people who looked like they were 15 or 16.

To me, that’s pretty damning, even if they are all 18+.

Also, it’s kind of surprising for me that the report went to blåhaj admins and not lemmynsfw ones, but I guess that’s ok.

On lemmy, a report goes to the admins of the instance that the reporter is on. The admins of the instance the reported account is on, the admins of the instance the community is on and the mods of the community

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Well you know, except for the one that started this whole thing, and the first couple I saw when I had a closer look at the community…

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

If there was a way to have kept this post local only, I would have used it. The fact that there isn’t doesn’t make it an open invite

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

People who use a community looking for “child like” content from their models probably aren’t the unbiased sample group you think they are

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

No one is looking at a little and thinking that they’re physically 15.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I looked at something that looked like CSAM. I looked at the community, and saw more content that was sitting right on the border of CSAM. The sidebar told me childlike content was allowable.

There was no misunderstanding. My exposure to the content in that community was content that appeared to my eyes to be CSAM.

Telling me that if I looked hard enough I would see that they’re all adults, or that “childlike” was only there because of a copy and paste doesn’t fundamentally alter that. I don’t care that they’re all adults. I care that many of them are framed to look like they’re not.

This is not a misunderstanding. This isn’t ignorance. This isn’t confusion.

This is a difference in expectations and understanding of acceptable content.

ada,
@ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Of course I’m biased. I haven’t tried to hide that. I’m not approaching this from a dispassionate, disconnected perspective and have no desire to pretend I am. I had a strong emotional response to something that looked like CSAM. I saw more content that looked like CSAM. I saw a sidebar that actively encourages childlike content. I got told by the admins of the community that it was fine with them.

So I defederated, and it doesn’t impact you at all, as you’re not on either instance.

And I would do so again. And your snarky replies aren’t going to change that.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • thenastyranch
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • ethstaker
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • tacticalgear
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • Durango
  • osvaldo12
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines