@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

db0

@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Epicurean Revolutionary Libertarian Socialist

I make FOSS things:

wiki-user: db0

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Continue with that analogy. What would happen if that woman had no other option. Should she choose the nice guy, the chad or object to the choice being fostered upon her and choose nobody? And if she’s paired anyway with that person, should she then act as if it was her choice, or take actions to disengage from that person and destroy the system that caused these turn of events?

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

So the woman in our scenario should decide to choose the “Nice Guy” tactically?

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I don’t think it does. A choice fostered upon me at the threat of violence is not a choice at all. I refuse to participate and therefore legitimize such a farce.

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Who said I’m “doing nothing”? Voting isn’t doing anything. Only actions outside the ballot matter.

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar
db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

It really doesn’t. This is the momentum of your country either way. Or did you forget that your democrats had chances to put Supreme Court justices and they just…didn’t?

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

And so I refer you back to my first comment in this thread

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

My point to this kind of comment is made in that post. We’re just looping at this point.

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I understand that I’m living in an oppressive system enforced by violence and that my life is shaped at the threat of state violence. you don’t need to reiterate that to me. It’s why I’m not legitimizing it by participating in this farce of “democracy” and instead dedicate my life to changing it.

Whichever puppet is on top doesn’t change all that whatsoever. Nor will your platitudes about be “accepting the democratic consensus of the many” when I don’t have the alternative due to said violence.

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Non-participation is not the same as doing nothing. If she chooses to date neither, neither is in her life. If you do nothing, you still get trump or Biden. The analogy doesn’t hold.

Continue with that analogy. What would happen if that woman had no other option. Should she choose the nice guy, the chad or object to the choice being fostered upon her and choose nobody? And if she’s paired anyway with that person, should she then act as if it was her choice, or take actions to disengage from that person and destroy the system that caused these turn of events?

It fits. You say the analogy doesn’t fit because “we don’t have a choice”. I tell you to adjust the analogy so that the woman doesn’t have a choice either.

db0,
@db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Take a look at budget market Buddha over here…

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • rosin
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • vwfavf
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • megavids
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines