Independently from the whole story, how can someone with responsibility in a health related governing body, in a public professional statement, give any kind of credit to Mercury retrograde?
I don’t know but, if he was, it would be good to phrase it as an affirmation with maybe a reason or a source. If he wasn’t, we are here “just asking questions” and maybe perpetuating a smear.
For me The Name of the Rose is a real masterpiece. I enjoyed The Prague Cemetery as much as Foucault’s Pendulum but I’d personally put Baudolino before those two.
Edit: this was a reply for @ThisIsNotHim, for some reason I keep pressing the wrong reply arrow on the Voyager app.
To be honest it isn’t my benchmark, I was just adding that to the context in the same way I could have added any other differential circumstance: my point is that it’s more complicated than what the article says.
And that it’s probably less about “someone think about the baristas” and more about the benefits, but that’s another story.