@michael_w_busch@mastodon.online
@michael_w_busch@mastodon.online avatar

michael_w_busch

@michael_w_busch@mastodon.online

Planetary astronomer, studying piles of rock in space. Reader of books. Drinker of tea. He/him. This is a personal account. To bigotry no sanction.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

johncarlosbaez, to random
@johncarlosbaez@mathstodon.xyz avatar

I want to read this book: A Darwinian Survival Guide. Sounds like a realistic view of what we need to do now. You can read an interview with one author, the biologist Daniel Brooks. A quote:

...

Daniel Brooks: What can we begin doing now that will increase the chances that those elements of technologically-dependent humanity will survive a general collapse, if that happens as a result of our unwillingness to begin to do anything effective with respect to climate change and human existence?

Peter Watts: So to be clear, you’re not talking about forestalling the collapse —

Daniel Brooks: No.

Peter Watts: — you’re talking about passing through that bottleneck and coming out the other side with some semblance of what we value intact.

Daniel Brooks: Yeah, that’s right. It is conceivable that if all of humanity suddenly decided to change its behavior, right now, we would emerge after 2050 with most everything intact, and we would be “OK.” We don’t think that’s realistic. It is a possibility, but we don’t think that’s a realistic possibility. We think that, in fact, most of humanity is committed to business as usual, and that’s what we’re really talking about: What can we begin doing now to try to shorten the period of time after the collapse, before we “recover”? In other words — and this is in analogy with Asimov’s Foundation trilogy — if we do nothing, there’s going to be a collapse and it’ll take 30,000 years for the galaxy to recover. But if we start doing things now, then it maybe only takes 1,000 years to recover. So using that analogy, what can some human beings start to do now that would shorten the period of time necessary to recover?

https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-collapse-is-coming-will-humanity-adapt/

michael_w_busch,
@michael_w_busch@mastodon.online avatar

@johncarlosbaez I do not appreciate the parts of that interview where Daniel Brooks appears to treat the large majority of humans as disposable.

Quite possibly including himself: His imagined "prepper" small town would likely not be able to provide the appendectomy he once needed.

(Peter Watts does make a relevant point there; regarding Brooks' book being co-opted.)

One can work for the needed immediate systemic changes to maintain vital infrastructure without suggesting abandoning people.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • everett
  • DreamBathrooms
  • khanakhh
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • JUstTest
  • tester
  • Durango
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines