Am I going to find you railing about DEI in other comments if I trawl your history? I haven't, but this is worded like the kind of complaint that comes from someone who normally thinks diversity is awful, except when it's old white guys being excluded.
Ah yes, because if there's one thing racist bigots reliably do, it's not lie about being racist bigots.
What is that you guys always say about laws that touch on the 2nd amendment instead of trying to solve our gun violence problem? - "we already have enough gun control laws, just enforce them."
Well, we already have laws that touch on limits of the first amendment, just enforce them. What's this do that existing defamation/slander/libel laws don't do aside from coddle the snowflake bigots?
It's not about sounding intellectual, it's about recognizing that Trump's behavior leads directly to these actions. Yes, magas are little bitches about everything, but those little bitches aren't randomly fucking shit up, they are doing so for their leader and in direct response to his rhetoric and wishes.
Honestly I see elections as voting for your preferred enemy. They are never on our side. How about this, we agree that he’s better than Trump and that any reasonable person is forced to vote for him, and then we criticise him because we want better than neoliberal austerity and genocide apologia?
In a brief submitted by the State of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to "convey the government’s message," and that can be accomplished through "the removal of speech that the government disapproves."
In a brief submitted by the State of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to "convey the government’s message," and that can be accomplished through "the removal of speech that the government disapproves."