masquenox,

I have to constantly remind the white supremacists in my country (South Africa) that the only reason the US isn’t ranked higher than South Africa in those silly “corruption indexes” rich people’s media loves so much is because the stuff that gets called corruption over here is perfectly legal in the US.

In South Africa, pigs stealing your stuff is thoroughly illegal - not that this stops SA pigs, of course - while it’s been perfectly legalized in the US.

And it can’t be corrupt if it’s perfectly legal, right?

Notyou,

And it can’t be corrupt if it’s perfectly legal, right?

Well that is how they made bribery legal as long as you use PACs.

exanime,

Land of the free?

techognito,
@techognito@lemmy.world avatar

“You are free to do what we, the rich and powerful, tells you”

“You shall own nothing and be happy”

don’t know where these quotes came from, but they fit all too well the situation in the USA

ChicoSuave,

If only those 6 conservative justices would have their property seized by police. Doesn’t matter if they didn’t do anything; never did.

space,

You do realize these laws don’t apply to the rich. The police is there to protect the rich.

Fedizen,

This is the supreme court rewriting the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendments against search, seizure and due process.

There should be additional checks and balances on supreme court decisions such as their decisions not taking effect unless approved by congress.

drdiddlybadger,
@drdiddlybadger@pawb.social avatar

Yeah it’s pretty disheartening when SCOTUS makes a bat shit ruling and we are all supposed to just abide by it. If they have a heinous ruling they should be thrown out over it.

some_guy,

Canada put out a warning against carrying large sums of cash when vacationing in USA because of this. Fucking insane that we allow this.

henfredemars,

No worries people. The Supreme Court is just formalizing the notion that they aren’t subject to consequences. This will surely improve the public perception of cops.

Gigan,
@Gigan@lemmy.world avatar

Ughhh. I’m not surprised. This problem needs to be attacked with legislation

ironhydroxide,

Yes, but you see, the legislators need the police to protect them from the unwashed masses. But the legislators don’t want to have to pay the police themselves, so how do they compensate the police for the extra protection? By leaving asset forfeiture in place; Legislators don’t have to do anything, and get benefit from it. Police only have to claim your property is guilty of being involved in a crime, and boom, it’s theirs now.

lugal,

ACAB

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • ethstaker
  • JUstTest
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines