neuralreckoning,
@neuralreckoning@neuromatch.social avatar

So what would it take to publish a paper here on mastodon and do public peer review? Just an agreement to use a few hashtags like , and in replies things like , , , ? Some automatically generated web and pdf output summarising the thread? Submission to something like Zenodo to give a DOI? Linking user accounts to orcid to verify identity? Only real problem I see is that even with markdown and LaTeX, Mastodon posts are not well suited for longer posts with multiple figures etc. Maybe fine for short results though?

albertcardona,
@albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@neuralreckoning

Perhaps software publishing requires a new application that happens to implement ActivityPub but isn't necessarily Mastodon.

What you are describing reminds me of @joss https://github.com/openjournals/joss

maegul,
@maegul@hachyderm.io avatar

@neuralreckoning

I'd use groups or threadiverse communities (like sub-reddits).

One for peer review, and another for "publication" which could require a link to the peer review discussion tree .

On posting to "publication" some automated process ensues for the rest. There formatting can be richer or blog-like too, with comments/discussion trees for both stages too.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • modclub
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • mdbf
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • everett
  • normalnudes
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • cisconetworking
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • cubers
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines