Is there a place in the oral arguments or in the missives from the Supreme Court where the more reasonable justices can raise and call attention to the outrageous actions, conflicts of interests of their peers?
Shouldn't having a symbol, in support of an attempt to steal an election at one of their homes make it in to the record?
Could they be more aggressive in this way? If not why not?
They all pretend to be so impartial and its dishonest. It's ugly.
Add comment