billgoats,
@billgoats@bitbang.social avatar

A few folk were going 'blah blah blah your panels are at the wrong angle for your latitude blah blah blah it'l gonna be so bad blah blah blah’ when I showed the polycarbonate bins with a 10~15° angle that they would be installed onto.

Well, here we are with a clear day in early April and they're pumping out 3,500 watts out of a theoretical-maximum-that-will-never-actually-be-reached of 4,000 watts.

That's not so bad, I'd say ☀️

TonyJWells,
@TonyJWells@mastodon.social avatar

@billgoats
In some places there's such a glut of panels that they're being used as fences. A 90° tilt is clearly sub optimal but still works.

billgoats,
@billgoats@bitbang.social avatar

@TonyJWells I feel like the youtubes are way too full of guys droning on and on obsessively, insisting that solar panels absolutely need to be 100% completely optimal at all times otherwise they are useless. Turns out that that's just not the case at all.

tomw,
@tomw@mastodon.social avatar

@billgoats @TonyJWells I think this is a general condition of early adopters – it's rare that people want to go through all that effort to get something that operates at, say, 90% of its theoretical capacity, even if 90% is perfectly adequate. Like telling an early computer user that they won't be able to use all their RAM.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • solar
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • ethstaker
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • tester
  • everett
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines