Young men aren’t being forced to follow toxic masculine icons like Tate and Peterson, they’re choosing to consume their content over healthy masculine icons.
Models for healthy masculinity exist. They’re unpopular, because young men don’t want to be healthy. They are choosing to be toxic.
So let’s all remember who is at fault and who needs to change here - it’s the menfolk, not everyone else. Stay fabulous. Get a cat.
Vraiment messieurs, si vous voulez être de vrais alliés, observez qui parle et qui écoute qui dans les réunions pseudo mixtes au boulot ou ds vos assos, orgas non boulot.
C'est éclairant.
Et reprenez vos collègues homme qui coupent la parole aux femmes. Demandez leur de répéter ce qui a été dit.
Observez les dynamiques de pouvoir et de hiérarchie (même qd il n'est pas sensé y avoir de hiérarchie)
It’s literally in the “Opinion” section of the Guardian’s website.
Do you have statistics about how much exposure the average teenage boy has to radical feminists?
No, not on hand. This is just my opinion, but the author of the op-ed above even suggests feminist slogans might be part of the reason why the data from the study looks the way it does. Teenage boys are at least as exposed to social media as the rest of us (or do I need an official study to make that claim too?), so I think it’s safe to assume they’re exposed to posts about “toxic masculinity,” “mansplaining,” “manspreading,” “#yesallmen,” “ironic misandry,” and articles like this and this.
obligatory bear post (lemmy.cafe)
is the man or bear thing rhetorically or optically the perfect feminist meme that is beyond criticism? no....
deleted_by_author
Are teenage boys in the US becoming more conservative – or more dangerously apathetic? (www.theguardian.com)