Viking_Hippie

@Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Viking_Hippie,

I guess the fascist cop (but I repeat myself) Eric Adams is starting his reelection campaign early…

Viking_Hippie,

Wtf is rust and why is it such an extreme RAM hog?

Viking_Hippie,

Dude. Even if you DO ignore that it’s become part of a fascist movement (which you shouldn’t), it’s still called the “appeal to heaven” flag.

SCOTUS is a secular court that’s tasked with interpreting a constitution that specifically forbids an establishment religion. Asserting in public view that there’s a heaven to appeal to is therefore inherently a big no-no.

Viking_Hippie,

Locke’s contention was that no man had inherent power to regulate or restrict divine arbitration in civil affairs. Even in dire circumstances, he alleged, natural rights transcended the political process.

So, in the context of today, he’s basically arguing for SCOTUS to be replaced with a religious tribunal and any secular constitution with “natural” (read: religious dogma) law. THAT doesn’t sound like something a SCOTUS judge should be advocating either…

Viking_Hippie,

Well it was explicitly anti-secular to begin with, so never something a SCOTUS judge should be flying regardless of the christofascists adopting it.

Viking_Hippie,

Is there any sanity in Hamas’s calculus

I don’t know about sanity, but it’s very logical when you remember that Hamas is a terrorist group that sometimes governs rather than the other way around.

The genocide is pretty much the best thing that could happen to them. They may pretend to care about Palestinian lives, but in reality they only care about their own power and influence.

And how does a terrorist group gain power and influence? By radicalizing people to join.

What’s more radicalizing than the myriad daily atrocities of a brutal apartheid regime supported by the most powerful countries in the world? Very little if anything.

Viking_Hippie,

flawed ally

REALLY? Is that how you would describe the fascist apartheid regime currently engaging in genocide and myriad other crimes against humanity on a daily basis? A flawed fucking ally?

You genocide-denying apologists are fucking wild! 🤦🤬

Viking_Hippie,

You should start a Lemmy community called NotAvocado about things that aren’t avocado. I’d do it myself but I’m too lazy to find out how, let alone moderate it afterwards 😄

Viking_Hippie,

Definitely an avocado.

Viking_Hippie,

Other People’s Progeny?

Ostensibly Popular Politician?

Often Perplexed Penguin?

Viking_Hippie,

It’s not really a word

Since it’s used to convey meaning using letters and people understand that meaning, it by any definition that matters IS a word.

Also it clearly implies something is inherent to “Caucasians”

No. “Particularly Caucasians” ≠ “all Caucasians”.

I can’t be bothered to do any clever wordplay on the other supposed racial categories

Good, because that would likely be punching down, unlike pointing out how audacious some white people are with their privilege.

but I suspect any equivalent puns might be considered a little problematic, what what?

No, they wouldn’t be equivalent. Pointing out white privilege and criticizing those that wield it as both a sword and a shield is not the same as making fun of less privileged people or even white people who are aware of and don’t exploit their privilege.

Viking_Hippie,

It’s not actually subjective. That’s just how bigotry and privilege works 🤷

Viking_Hippie,

So, racism bad, except against white people

Nope. Pointing out that someone is being racist isn’t itself racist.

Viking_Hippie,

Still not racism against white people.

Viking_Hippie,

Yeah, if you look up the term “failing upwards”, there’s just a picture of him smiling his most obnoxious smile.

Incidentally, the same thing happens when you look up “regulatory capture”.

Viking_Hippie,

I’m not even sure why Biden even bothered because everyone already knows this.

Because a lot of people actually don’t and will likely fall for this brazen PR stunt.

Viking_Hippie,

They have kidnapped civilians held in captive under god knows what conditions.

Same goes for Israel and their hundreds if not thousands of baseless arrests of Palestinians who they then often torture. We never hear about them, though, since they don’t have a PR budget or indeed anything.

Second, you’re comparing people who block aid trucks to people who raped and slaughtered families.

Nope, I didn’t compare those civilian Israeli people to the IDF.

Think about what type of person it takes to do either of these, then realize who you’re excusing.

All whataboutism aside, it have never said anything positive about Hamas and their terrorism. Palestinians ≠ Hamas.

You, on the other hand, are excusing the IDF, whose atrocities are just as barbaric as those of Hamas and who are an occupation force.

Both extremists are despicable, but coloring Palestinian extremists as “resisting”

Again, I was talking about the favorite victims of the IDF, not Hamas

raping and abusing bodies

Why do you keep pivoting to the IDF?

Israelis as genocidal is plain hypocritical.

Nope, the IDF and other parts of the Israeli government are by the official definition committing genocide. That’s not just an opinion or a matter under review, that’s a fact.

And again Palestinians ≠ Hamas

Both extremists are genocidal

No. That’s not how genocide works. Saying “death to Israel” and then committing an enormous one day atrocity isn’t a genocide. Absolutely unforgivably barbaric, yes, but not genocide.

with one side being more barbaric

Not really, no. Both of the active sides are about equally barbaric. One is more in the wrong, though, because that one has all the power to stop the bloodshed. The one you consider less barbaric, in case you wonder.

We should condemn both

That’s what I’m doing

and not make excuses for both.

Please take your own advice.

But since you’re providing excuses for one side (“resisting”)

As I’ve pointed out many times i don’t, never have and never will consider terrorism legitimate resistance. So no, I’m not.

I wanted to provide the excuse for the other side

So it’s ok for you to be a hypocrite if you accuse me of hypocrisy first? 🙄

Which tbh, is a better excuse

No, it’s not. The Israeli people care about the hostages, but Netanyahu and the IDF don’t. Their indiscriminate destruction is a greater danger to them than their captors and the IDF has murdered at least two of them already.

since it can actually possibly get them results

No. Only result they’re going for is to murder or expel as many Palestinians alive they can get away with and then take the territory for themselves. They’ve already started “resettling” Gaza.

getting the kidnapped back is an option

Not one that Netanyahu and the IDF consider more important than murder and conquest.

exterminating all jews is less so

That was always hateful rhetoric rather than a literal goal.

Extermination and displacement of all Palestinians, though? THAT’S something that can and likely WILL happen if nobody stops the genocidal apartheid regime.

Viking_Hippie,

From the Upper Midwest?! Exactly HOW fast IS your car?? 😛

Viking_Hippie,

The answer is much more complicated than your question, so I’m gonna let an actual expert explain.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • provamag3
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines