ZeroCool

@ZeroCool@slrpnk.net

Formerly @ZeroCool

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ZeroCool,

Typical “responsible gun owner” hot take, folks.

ZeroCool, (edited )

Was it extra dangerous because it was a Glock pistol and not Sig Sauer? Would it have been less an issue if it was .380 Auto or .45 ACP instead of 9mm?

Lemmy when every minor detail isn’t contained within the headline:
The StAtE oF MoDeRn JoUrNaLiSm Is AbYsMaL!!!1!

Lemmy when the headline contains relevant detail:
WhY ArE ThEsE JoUrNaLiStS bEiNg So SpEcIfIc?!?1?

ZeroCool,

If that’s what you meant you would have said that. But you didn’t. You’re clearly upset that vanity fair had the nerve to mention the specific gun. Otherwise you wouldn’t have praddled off three other examples to highlight your point. Nice attempt at saving face though.

ZeroCool, (edited )

Yes, as I originally said, everyone on Lemmy thinks they know how to do journalist’s jobs better than they do and it’s beyond old at this point. I’m just going to go ahead and block you now as your lengthy off-topic complaints about journalistic practices have added nothing relevant to the discussion of the actual story.

ZeroCool, (edited )

Rule 6. All posts must be news articles.

Now as far as the weird, unsubstantiated, focus on the attacker being Jewish goes, I’d recommend OP fuck off back to stormfront, twitter, truth social or whatever neo-nazi enclave they prefer.

ZeroCool,

Well I’m not Jewish and I can also see your blatant anti-Semitic agenda clear as day. Fuck off back to stormfront, Adolf.

ZeroCool,

shapeshift

Jesus Christ you’re on some real vintage ‘90s conspiracy theory forum levels of anti-Semitism. Holy shit.

ZeroCool,

Agreed. Mods are apparently AWOL but I’m genuinely surprised the Lemmy.world admins haven’t intervened either. From what I understand they receive reports for communities on their instance too.

ZeroCool,

Well you gave us an example of an “acceptably political” game so why didn’t you include an example of one that you think missed the mark? Surely, that was an innocent, if embarrassing, oversight… Right? “Gee wiz, I forgot to support half my argument! Shucks!”

ZeroCool,

If that’s what you took away from this you’re an idiot.

ZeroCool, (edited )

Lmao. So OP is unwilling to show others the simple courtesy of respecting their gender identity then comes running here to whine about dIsReSpeCt because their bigoted hot take got them a three day ban from a community. 🙄

Edit: Ooooh and they’re on a three day old account too? In that case I give it an hour or two before they realize they aren’t getting any sympathy here and run to r/RedditAlternatives to complain about “censorship” on Lemmy and lament the lack of freeze peach reddit alternatives.

ZeroCool, (edited )

Have you ever wondered why that is? LGBTQ and non-binary people existed in the 19th century too, they just weren’t safe to live as they chose to publicly. And when it was mentioned in literature it was typically couched in euphemisms of the period. I understand that you’d clearly prefer all these people go back in the closet rather than be inconvenienced by having to acknowledge their existence, but are you really daft enough to think this is something dreamed up in the 2010s? For fuck sake…

ZeroCool,

Yes, homosexuality and non-gender conforming individuals have existed throughout human history and across all cultures with varying social attitudes toward them. You know, you’re quite opinionated for someone with no demonstrable understanding of the topic, but I suppose that explains a lot.

ZeroCool,

OP received a 3 day temporary ban for violating the instance’s rule against transphobia. That in no way, shape, or form, constitutes a moderator “power trip.”

ZeroCool,

I neither said nor implied any such thing. You brought up books written in the 1800s which is why my initial reply specifically focused on the 19th century. You’re either dumb or you’re here in bad faith, but based on your last sentence, being a weak attempt to shift the conversation from LGBTQ and non-binary people to pederasts, which is straight out of the right-wing playbook, it’s safe to assume the latter. So we’re done here.

ZeroCool,

Due to budget limitations, the agency often has to rely on the food manufacturers themselves to do their own testing.

Because properly funding the FDA costs money so we’re better off allowing corporations to operate on the honor system according to a large percentage of morons, both historic and contemporary.

ZeroCool, (edited )

The bill as amended by Rep. Gino Bulso, R-Brentwood, would prohibit first-cousin marriage unless the parties to the marriage contract received counseling from a genetic counselor licensed by the board of medical examiners. Bulso argued during a House floor session on Thursday the bill – as written – could violate the Obergefell v. Hodges U.S. Supreme Court decision, which made same-sex marriage legal across the country.

Bulso, while explaining his reasoning, said the bill was introduced as a public health-related matter, adding the law needed to be passed to prevent cousins from getting married and conceiving a child that could have an increased risk for birth defects. Bulso argued two men who are first cousins could get married without the risk of conceiving a child with birth defects.

This is just another bigoted conservative with an agenda. He’s using this no-brainer anti-cousin-fucking law to push anti-LGBTQ rhetoric. Gino Bulso was a lawyer for just shy of 40 years before joining the Tennessee House of Reps in 2022. He knows this isn’t a reasonable argument and he doesn’t care. He’s just trying to attack Obergefell v. Hodges. He’s basically saying “See what the gays are making me vote against?! I don’t want to allow cousin-fucking but Obergefell v. Hodges says we have to! Trust me, I’m a lawyer!

Edit: JFC nothing brings out the weirdos as quickly as an article about a ban on cousin-fucking.

ZeroCool, (edited )

Maybe (probably) he’s saying it to beat on LGBTQ people, but a broken clock and all that.

I am not willing to give republicans the benefit of the doubt when it comes to their invocations of Obergefell v. Hodges to defend cousin-fucking. If you’d like to that’s your prerogative. But doing so is completely unearned on their part and suggests naivety on yours.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • cubers
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines