@BasicAppleGuy in my perfect world, it would be called macOS ‘25, along with iOS ‘25, iPadOS ‘25, watchOS ‘25, and so on.
I’m pretty techy and own many Apple things, and I can just about remember we’re on iOS 17 and watchOS 10. I’ve no idea what codename of a place in America that I’d never before heard of is used by the current macOS, or what order any of them go in.
But this is probably far too logical to hope for 😅
@Daojoan or is it just good advice that in the depressingly capitalist world we live in, the quickest and cheapest way of achieving something usually wins out? We’ve seen people and companies left behind by technology thousands of times over, it seems either arrogant or naive to assume it won’t happen again.
You can argue over whether something is good or bad all day long, but that doesn’t mean said thing isn’t going to happen regardless.
Vision Pro's international launch will be even tougher now that we know the device is two whole chip generations behind the iPad, and we've seen Apple's lackluster content/release cadence for it.
It desperately needs a whole lot more developer support and that doesn't come for free. Once that interest dies out…
Incidentally, forScore is the closest thing I've seen to a killer app
@stroughtonsmith honestly Apple’s chips could actually do with the kind of vague non-sequential naming scheme they reserve for macOS versions, so consumers stop worrying about the M version and just focus on the capabilities of the device.
On the flip side, it’s way past time they just adopted the year when naming their OS releases. MacOS ‘24 would be vastly more useful than some forgettable name of a place in America that I’d never heard of before 😂
@macrumors people will criticise because it’s Samsung, but it’s pretty good marketing tbh. If it were the other way around, and Samsung had made an ad crushing creative tools followed by Apple releasing a response like this one, Apple fanboys would lap it up.
Some of the iPad angst isn't that we have to wait 'till WWDC to see if the software is improved.
It's that little birdies have strongly hinted to us not to expect iPad to really go anywhere from here, that Vision Pro has sucked up all the oxygen inside Apple.
That iPad never really had the resources to fulfill its promises, and much of what was there has now been diverted.
That Apple's design folks couldn't really understand why anybody would want to use an iPad for anything but Pencil work
@stroughtonsmith it constantly baffles me how frequently Apple products get neglected (both hardware and software). They’re the most valuable company in the world - do they really not have the resources to have a full time team dedicated to making something like the iPad the best it possibly can be at all times? Wild.
According to Stu Maschwitz at @prolost the "Let Loose" Apple iPad event was shot entirely on iPhone — but with external lenses. Pretty interesting setup! https://prolost.com/blog/panavision-iphone
@appleinsider AppleInsider still complaining every time somebody dares question the business ethics of the literal second biggest corporation in the world I see
@appleinsider are Apple themselves actually using the term “AI” now? Have they finally given in and jumped on the buzzword bandwagon?
They’ve obviously been big users of AI for many years, but always seem to notably make a point of avoiding saying “AI” and instead going with “ML” or “LLM” etc.