GunnarRunnar,

Why do people behave as if Starfield was the first game not released on PlayStation?

Who is doing that? It's just blatantly obvious that it would've been released on PlayStation without Microsoft meddling and their games sell a shitload, I mean Skyrim has been chugging along over a decade now. So I'm not really sure how Starfield is irrelevant to Ms buying shit conversation.

It's not what being an exclusive means (let not get into linguistics here, I mean strictly the gaming industry term). I agree this specific case was anticompetitive but framing it as an exclusive just weakens this point in my opinion and allows to shift the debate away from it.

Away from what? Everyone knows what it means -- or maybe I don't, please enlighten me in that case.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • games@lemmy.world
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • provamag3
  • InstantRegret
  • khanakhh
  • tester
  • everett
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines