gilbertc, 11 months ago Maybe we can aggregate instances at the magazine level? For example, a 'technology' aggregated magazine will be composed of 'technology@kbin', 'technology@lemmy.ml' and so on. Losing one of the instances would not impact the 'aggregate'.
Maybe we can aggregate instances at the magazine level? For example, a 'technology' aggregated magazine will be composed of 'technology@kbin', 'technology@lemmy.ml' and so on. Losing one of the instances would not impact the 'aggregate'.