It does not matter. Classifications just encapsulate our growth. I write code and I love science, so I understand that in order to analyse and teach better we need to classify things into groups, but there is a limit in the usability, because as deeper we analyse humanity we always fall into the one thing it equal to all, we are all different. Some might call it race, I call it background, and that is just one of the dimensions. We can’t even precisely define human. So why try? Instead of classify, instead of analyze, can we just appreciate individuals as they are and then try to learn from that? Wouldn’t that make us better?
So I respectfully disagree with you too. As we don’t know everything about the universe, more and more opinions could be formed and there’s a realm of possibility where we as a group can form an opinion so widely and universally accepted, that is treated as fact, when in fact, it remains an opinion.
Only if you want to die alone. I’d rather have a microwave as a pet, I won’t get on my way and it will serve a purpose. The tier goes, S: Dogs A: Snakes B: Turtles C: Ferrets D: Fish F: Cats and Birds.
Add comment