Hexbear federation megathread

Hey folks

I have been receiving a lot of messages every single day about federation with hexbear. Some of our users are vehemently against it, others are in full support. The conversation does not seem to be dying down, rather, the volume of messages I receive about it seems to be increasing, so I am opening this public space where we can openly discuss the topic.

I am going to write a wall of text about my own thoughts on the situation, I’m sorry, but no tl;dr this time, and I ask anybody participating in this thread to first read through this post before commenting.

Before I go any further, I want to be clear that for anybody who participates here, it is required to focus on the quality of your posts. That means:

  • Be kind to each other, even if you disagree
  • Use arguments rather than calling people names
  • Realize that this is a divisive topic, so your comments should be even more thoughtful than usual

With that out of the way, there are a few things I want to cover.

On defederation in general

First of all, I am a firm believer that defederation must be reserved only for cases where all other methods have failed. If defederation is used liberally, then a small group of malicious users can effectively completely shut down the federated network, by simply creating the type of drama between instances which would inevitably result in defederation. In my view, federation is the biggest strength of Lemmy compared to any centralized discussion forum, so naturally I think maintaining federation by default is an important goal in general.

I am also a believer in the value of deplatforming hateful content, but I think defederation is not the best way to do this. Banning individual users, banning communities and establishing a culture of mutual support between mods and admins of different instances should be the first line of defense against such content. There are some further steps that can be taken before defederation as well, but these are not really documented anywhere (in order to prevent circumvention). The point is: for myself, defederation is the absolute last resort, only to be used when it is completely clear that other methods are ineffective.

Finally, I am wary of creating a false expectation among lemm.ee users that lemm.ee admins endorse all users and communities and content on instances we are federated with. Here at lemm.ee, we use a blocklist for federation, which means our default apporach is to federate with all new instances. We do not have the resources (manpower, skills and knowledge) necessary to pass judgement on all instances which exist out there, as a result, users on lemm.ee are expected to curate their own content to quite a high degree. In addition to downvoting and/or reporting as necessary, individual lemm.ee users are also able to block specific users and communities, and the ability to block entire instances is coming very soon as well.

Having said all that, in a situation where all other methods do indeed fail, defederation is not out of the question. Making such a call is up to the discretion of lemm.ee admins, and doing it as a last resort is completely in line with our federation policy.

Regarding hexbear

Hexbear is an established Lemmy instance, focused on many flavors of leftism. They have quite a large userbase who are very active on Lemmy (often so active that they leave the impression brigading all popular Lemmy posts). One important thing to note is that while some forms of bigotry seem to be quite accepted by many hexbear users (but seemingly not by mods - more on that below), they at least are very protective of LGBT rights (and yes, I am quite certain that they are not just pretending to do this, as many users seem to believe). Additionally, while I have noticed quite high quality posts from hexbear users, there are also several users there who seem to really enjoy trolling and baiting (very reminiscent of 4chan-type “for the lulz” posting), and it’s important to note that this kind of posting is in general allowed on hexbear itself.

The reason this whole topic is important to so many people right now (despite hexbear being a relatively old instance), is that hexbear only recently enabled federation. A combination of their volume of posts, their strong convictions, the excitement about federation, and the aforementioned trolling has made them very visible to almost all Lemmy users, and this has sparked discussions about the value of federation with hexbear on a lot of Lemmy instances.

My own experience with hexbear

I want to write down my own experience with interacting with hexbear users, mods, and admins over the past few days. I believe this experience will highlight why I am hesitant to advocate for immediate full defederation from hexbear at this point in time, and am for now still more in favor of taking action on a more individual user basis. Please read and see how you feel about the situation afterwards.

Background

My first real contact with hexbear users was in the comments section of a post in this meta community requesting defederation from hexbear by @glimpythegoblin. That post is now locked, because several hexbear users very quickly started doing the aforementioned “for the lulz” type spamming of meme images in the comments (these are actually just emojis, but they are rendered as full-size images on all instances other than the source instance, due to a current Lemmy bug).

I did not want to take further actions in that thread in general (for archival purposes), but I did take one action, which in retrospect was a mistake: I removed a comment which contained the hammer and sickle symbol. I ignorantly associated this symbolism with Kremlin propaganda, and the atrocities my own people suffered at the hands of the soviet union during the previous century. Many users (including hexbear users) correctly (and politely) pointed out to me in DMs that the symbol has a much broader use than just as the symbol of the USSR, and people elsewhere in the world may not associate it with the USSR at all. I am grateful for users who pointed this out to me without resorting to personal attacks.

Let me be clear here: while I do not have anything against leftism or communist ideas in general (in fact in today’s world, I think discussion of such ideas is quite necessary), Kremlin propaganda has no place on lemm.ee. Any dehumanizing talking points of the Kremlin on lemm.ee are treated as any other bigotry, and if communist symbolism is used in context of Kremlin propaganda (that is the context in which I have been exposed to it throughout my whole life), then it will still be removed. But there is no blanket ban on communist symbolism in general on lemm.ee, and discussing and advocating for leftist and communist topics (as distinct from the imperialist and dehumanizing policies of the Kremlin) is certainly allowed on lemm.ee.

Hexbear user response

Coming back to the events of the past few days: soon after my removal of the comment containing the symbol from the meta thread, two posts popped up on hexbear. One was focused on insulting and spreading lies about me personally. Another was focused on diminishing the horrors of the soviet occupation in my country. In the comments under both of these posts (and in a few other threads on hexbear), I noticed some seriously disturbing bigotry against my people. There were comments which reflected the anti-Estonian propaganda of the current Russian state, things like:

  • Suggesting that my people has no right to exist
  • Stating that my people (and other Baltic nations) are subhuman
  • Claiming that anybody critical of both nazi and soviet occupations is themselves a nazi and a holocaust denier

I expect to hear such statements from the Russian state - here in Estonia, we are subjected to this and other kinds of bigotry constantly from Russian media - but to see it spread openly in non-Russian channels is extremely disturbing. Such bigotry is completely against lemm.ee rules in general. Additionally, my identity is public information, because I feel it’s important for the integrity of lemm.ee that I don’t hide behind anonymity. Considering this, I’m sure you can understand why I am very worried about my own safety when people leave comments in many unrelated threads (where my original posts are not even visible), baselessly calling me a nazi and a holocaust denier.

Note that the goal of this post is not to start a new debate in the comments about the the repressions of the soviet union in Estonia or other occupied territories, but if the topic interests any users, I can recommend the 2006 documentary The Singing Revolution (imdb). The trailer is a bit cheesy, but the actual film contains lots of historical footage from the soviet occupation, and also many interviews with people who experienced it, who share stories which are deeply familiar to all Estonians. If anybody is interested in further discussion, then I suggest making a post about it in the Estonian community here: !eesti.

Hexbear admin response

After the above events had played out, I reached out to hexbear admins for clarification on their moderation policies and how they handle such cases. I was actually very happy with their response:

  1. They immediately removed the personal attacks and dehumanizing comments containing Kremlin propaganda from Hexbear, and assured me that such content is always handled by mods
  2. They told me that while there are all kinds of leftists on hexbear, Russian disinformation is generally either refuted in comments or removed by mods
  3. They implemented some additional rules on hexbear to try and reduce the trolling experienced by many other instances, including ours: hexbear.net/post/352119
My personal take-aways

Let me play the devil’s advocate here and employ some “self-whataboutism”: among all users that have been banned on lemm.ee for bigotry, the majority were actually not users from other instances, and in fact people with lemm.ee accounts. If we judge any larger instance only by bigoted posts that some of its users make, then we might as well declare all instances as cesspools and close down Lemmy completely. I believe it’s far more useful to judge instances based on moderation in response to such content. Just as we remove bigoted content from lemm.ee, I have also witnessed bigoted content being removed from hexbear.

At the same time, I am aware of some internal conflict between hexbear users over the more strict moderation they are now starting to employ, and I am definitely keeping an eye on that situation and how admins handle it.

I am also still quite worried about the amount of distinct users on hexbear who have posted Kremlin propaganda. I so far don’t have reason to believe that these users are employed by the Russian state, but the fact that they are spreading the same hateful content which can be seen on Russian television seems problematic to say the least, and it remains to be seen if moderators can truly keep up with such content.

Where thing stand right now

I am not convinced that we are currently at a point where the “last resort” of defederation is necessary. This is based on the presumption that our moderation workload at lemm.ee will not get out of hand just due to users from that particular instance. My current expectation is that as the excitement of federation calms down (and as new rules on hexbear go into effect), the currently relatively high volume of low effort trolling will be replaced by more thoughtful posts. If this is not the case then we will certainly need to re-evaluate things.

Additionally, nothing is changing about our own rules regarding bigotry. Especially relevant in the context of Kremlin propaganda, I want to say that dehumanizing anybody is not allowed on lemm.ee (hopefully I do not have to spell it out, but this of course includes Ukrainians, LGBT folks, and others that the Kremlin despises), and action will be taken against any users who do this, regardless of what instance they are posting from.

Finally, I am very interested to hear thoughts and responses from our own users. I am super grateful to anybody who actually took the time to read through this massive dump of my own thoughts, and I am very interested to get a proper understanding of how our users feel about what I’ve written here. Please share any thoughts in the comments.

ee_pewgar,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • booty,
    @booty@hexbear.net avatar

    !

    Vulnicura,

    I usually enjoy the conversations they create, could do less with the poopy pig but that’s not a big deal enough to defederate IMO.

    fuzzzerd,

    What is the deal with that pig anyway? I’m out of the loop, but I’ve seen it a few times.

    JohnBrownsBussy2,
    @JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net avatar

    It was a shock reaction image that became popular on r/cth and kind of became a mascot for the sub & then later for chapo.chat/hexbear.

    Honestly, we all got so used to it that it became a nothingburger internally, just a way to tell someone to eff off. I was surprised to see it actually affecting people post-federation, but that’s also attributable to the emoji bug.

    CW: Article on the source of Pig Poop Balls

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    This. It was basically a ‘we’re not going to dignify that with an answer’ shorthand for abusive or obviously trolling posts.

    kneel_before_yakub,

    It looks gross so sending it to people with stupid opinions is funny

    randint, (edited )

    As someone who has gotten many, many, many rude comments from hexbears, I felt the need to share my experience. (Some of the comments from hexbears were polite though.) These comments had me brooding over them all day long for a couple of days. (I have since then moved on.) I listed the links to the rude comments below, but I think I should make it clear that while I used to support the idea of defederating from them, I have changed my stance since I heard about the upcoming changes to Lemmy allowing users to block instances. I am no longer in favor of defederating from hexbear.net. People should be able to decide this for themselves, but it is too much effort to switch instances to decide which instances you don’t want to see.

    Please do also note that I chose to leave out the polite comments in the list below. If you don’t want to click on every link, just check out the first one and the last one.

    (roughly in chronological order)

    :::spoiler (very long list, click to expand)

    :::

    There are so many people who believe that the ideology suppressed by the government is always bad. While this is sometimes the case, this is definitely not the case for authoritarianism. (Edit: what I meant was that the ideology suppressed by the government is authoritarianism, which many hexbears seem to support)

    Edit 2: Before this is inevitably pointed out, I should admit that some of my comments were rude as well. I apologize for those comments.

    paurix,

    Hey randint,

    thank you for providing such an expansive high quality post with references. It must have been disheartening to you to see so many (external) people disregarding the opinion of someone actually living there.

    Kudos to you for trying to engage in discussion and getting over it afterwards!

    What_Religion_R_They,
    @What_Religion_R_They@hexbear.net avatar

    just want to point something out about your first link, but on hexbear we aren’t able to downvote comments. so the downvote spamming are from other instances. Unless I misunderstood what you mean

    rusticus,

    I completely agree with your comments and have had nearly identical experience from hexbears. It bothered me so much I went back to reddit after a 45 day hiatus. It heartens me to hear others are also concerned and if I can block those instances it would be helpful.

    alcoholicorn,

    Your account is 10 days old though.

    rusticus,

    Lol. I switched to lemm.ee from lemmy.world due to the issues with lemmy.world servers. Is that okay with you?

    alcoholicorn, (edited )

    Apologies, there’s been numerous people making things up about hexbear.

    edit- Wait, we were never federated with lemmy.world, we couldn’t have driven you back to reddit because we’ve never federated with the instance you said we drove you from!

    Weaselly little liar.

    randint, (edited )

    Gee, “weaselly little liar” in bold? I might have to revise my stance on not defederating.

    Historical_General,

    lol

    GrimChaos,

    That just means it took them 10 days to driven back to reddit after a 45 day hiatus from Reddit.

    I admit I’m in the same boat, I was on lemmy.world and now I am mostly on lemm.ee. And I have the same feelings and thinking about going back to reddit but I haven’t gone back… Yet.

    alcoholicorn,

    Hexbear couldn’t have driven him out of Lemmy.world because Hexbear never federated with Lemmy.world.

    spoilerobjection

    Also we’ve barely been federated with lemm.ee for a day. Has the first hours of interaction you’ve ever had with hexbear been so bad you’re planning to abandon the fediverse altogether?

    GrimChaos,

    I’m saying he and I switched from lemmy.world because it was being DDOSed attacked to the point it was unusable.

    However long it’s been, it’s been pretty unbearable (along with lemmygrad). It must feel longer than it was.

    I’m not leaving yet since the Connect app lets me block the instances on my phone. But I won’t lie, I’ve been tempted to go back to reddit.

    alcoholicorn,

    I […] have had nearly identical experience from hexbears. It bothered me so much I went back to reddit after a 45 day hiatus.

    He couldn’t have had such an experience if he’s not from an instance that was federated with hexbear.

    GrimChaos,

    But Lemm.ee is… I’m not getting the confusion here. My apologies if I’m missing something.

    xXthrowawayXx,

    That person says they were on world and switched to ee. They also say they were driven back to Reddit by hexbear. World preemptively defederated hexbear before any user interactions happened and ee and hexbear were federated for a day before this thread.

    So one day of hexbear on ee drove this poster back to Reddit. Or they’re lying about the experience on world.

    alcoholicorn,

    His first experience with someone from hexbear was literally my post responding to him right here.

    He came from a place that was never federated with hexbear, he is on a place that only federated with hexbear just now.

    GrimChaos,

    There are many comments and posts from hexbear… They interact with those (aka reading).

    I don’t know how long hexbear has been available to lemme.ee but I’m annoyed already. So, I think thats it’s entirely possible to drive people back to reddit by now.

    LinkedinLenin,

    We should definitely be defederated if our crimes are not only being annoying, but also violating linear time.

    randint,

    I feel like you’re just quibbling.

    Grimble,

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • kneel_before_yakub,

    Careful with ableist rhetoric. It’s not good even for dip shits

    DoiDoi, (edited )
    @DoiDoi@hexbear.net avatar

    There are so many people who believe that the ideology suppressed by the government is always bad. While this is sometimes the case, this is definitely not the case for authoritarianism.

    Wouldn’t the government suppressing an ideology also be authoritarian?

    (all governments are authoritarian)

    www.marxists.org/archive/marx/…/authority.htm

    Also can’t pass up the chance to point out that the capitalist USA has the world’s largest prison population by both total incarcerated and per capita. That seems pretty authoritarian to me.

    randint,

    Sorry, I think my sentence was worded poorly. What I meant was that authoritarianism is a concept suppressed by the government, yet some people believe that it is better than democracy.

    DoiDoi,
    @DoiDoi@hexbear.net avatar

    Democracy and authoritarianism are not mutually exclusive The USA is a “democracy.” The USA is also one of the most authoritarian countries in the world.

    randint,

    While it is possible for democracies to possess authoritarian elements, they are somewhat opposites of each other. Authoritarianism is characterized by the rejection of political plurality, and reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. The US embraces plurality and democratic voting, and also has a separation of powers. The government of the US does have its flaws, but it is by absolutely no means authoritarian. You are thinking about another word. While I’m not sure what that word is, ChatGPT suggests that it could be “illiberally democratic.”

    alcoholicorn,

    The government of the US does have its flaws, but it is by absolutely no means authoritarian.

    It has more people in prison than any other country, both in absolute and per capita. As for democracy, letting the people choose between two candidates that represent the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and pass laws accordingly, is not democratic. This is evidenced by the actions of the state always benefiting the capitalist class over the working class.

    randint,

    Having a lot of prisoners is not an indicator of authoritarianism. In addition, you should take note of the fact that the while US does have the highest incarceration rate per capita (629/100k in 2021) and the highest prisoner count (just over 2 million), China comes as a close second with 1690k prisoners. Though this is in part due to the massive population of China (the rate per capita is only 119/100k), this number only includes sentenced prisoners. There are many in pre-trial detention and figures for those aren’t available (was 650k back in 2009), bringing the total over the US.

    source: prisonstudies.org/…/world_prison_population_list_…

    brain_in_a_box,

    It really sounds like you’re starting from he conclusion that America isn’t authoritarian, and then tweaking your definition of authoritarian to insure that it agrees with you.

    GarbageShoot,

    ChatGPT failed you. In a political philosophical sense, the US is extremely liberal, maybe the most liberal country in the first world (at least if you are white and look cishet, etc). That, however, is exactly the problem, as liberalism places power in the hands of the wealthy.

    randint,

    ChatGPT failed you.

    Yeah, I guessed that when I saw it use the word liberal.

    commiewithoutorgans,
    @commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net avatar

    To add on here, the fact that liberalism is a bankrupt ideology which is fully represented by the US including its worst aspects can really not be shown in a comment in such a thread. Domenico Losurdo, in one of my favorite books ever, spends hundreds of pages detailing this in “Liberalism: A Counter History.”

    A much more easily digested but still incomplete essay can be found here: redsails.org/between-liberty-and-slavery/

    astral_avocado, (edited )

    deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • DoiDoi,
    @DoiDoi@hexbear.net avatar

    Thanks for your contribution to the discussion! Great stuff as always.

    astral_avocado,

    Just sticking to the normal level your people operate at!

    DoiDoi,
    @DoiDoi@hexbear.net avatar

    Clearly not true, but I hope you’re having fun with whatever it is you think you’re doing here!

    randint,

    Their claim is clearly true. You should read the comments I linked to one by one.

    brain_in_a_box,

    You should read some of your own comments.

    commiewithoutorgans,
    @commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net avatar

    I think you should likely expand more on this. Your replies are kinda low effort dunks, and we should be clearer about the why’s in such a thread where we are defending ourselves.

    Don’t just describe a contradiction but how the world can be understood through that contradiction and its various aspects. Linking on authority is, of course, always relevant to these claims, but try just a bit harder or don’t post onto such a thread, imo. Or just link to another comrade talking about the exact thing, because I’ve read like 50 better explanations/replies in the past week from hexbear comrades.

    commiewithoutorgans, (edited )
    @commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net avatar

    Like this one maybe, with the lead up to it (idk how to link the whole thread tbh): hexbear.net/comment/3738759

    randint,

    Thank you for your comment. I actually do want to know why some people do not view democracy and authoritarianism as opposites.

    kneel_before_yakub,

    Read on authority by Engels for actual explanation. Anything you hear here will be along those lines

    commiewithoutorgans,
    @commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net avatar

    I disagree with this. Not with Engels, but that this is really an answer to the above question. In fact, basically the only mention of anything relevant to this specific question is Engels claiming that they are kinda opposites in that democracy requires the subordination of the minority to the majority in a democratic vote. It is the basis for much understanding of authority in general for Marxists in a tactical sense, but we should legitimately stop using it as the end of all discussion about the concept itself and how it relates to others. Even on hexbear we’ve got anarchists who disagree despite having read Engels.

    commiewithoutorgans, (edited )
    @commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net avatar

    Not really disagreeing with the other comrade there, but more adding for clarity: the word “authoritarianism” seems to attempt to distinguish some state (all of which are entirely defined by the fact that they have authority over the land/people to utilize violence in implementing the state’s dictates/laws) utilizing it’s authority vs not utilizing it, but the claim we make is that this distinction is meaningless and undermines itself always.

    The fact that is that we can’t blow up pipelines because of property rights or else we will have violence done to us (put in prison, or killed if resisting that). This is authority over us. Chinese companies are not allowed to escape regulations within China without significant punishments (see the death penalties for CEOs who break environmental, finance, or labor laws). This is authority over them. These 2 examples are only distinct in who has the authority and who is prioritized in the interaction. But 1 is called authoritarianism and the other isn’t. Or compare: in the US, police who hurt journalists, imprisoned them, and saw absolutely no authority punish them vs the USSR, where those who has collaborated with the Nazi’s in WW2 were punished by being placed in a penal colony in Siberia to work in a mine. Again, the only real difference in authority is for whom and against whom.

    I for one would prefer a world where oil company’s property rights were not protected by any authority until astonishingly large changes were to be made for the protection of our environment, and I see the interests of ONLY the capitalist class represented in that authority. Most cases where authority is utilized can be easily tied to the direct interests of a group of people. When a group of people have shared interests based in the basic structure of our economy (private property rights and the ability to profit being the basis here mostly, as well as the ability to sell your labor power as a worker), we call that a class. This is why we say that authority is always performed in the interests of a class (because all actions and decisions of the state either align with or against those interests, even if mostly tangentially or aligned with multiple at once).

    This all just has very little to do with any understanding of democracy. The initial term of democracy was basically where everyone votes, but this term is not really used in the contexts we are talking about anymore and is restricted to small groups. We now usually understand democracy as either the sort of chauvinist version westerners use (where being a republic with votes where American observers are allowed is really the only criteria) or just a system which is able to take input from its people and perform in a way which the people approve. Whether this is direct voting, voting for a representative, or public caucuses and discussions is less material than the fact that the information is utilized and the outcomes desired are reached. (Edit addition here, something I thought of while responding elsewhere that fits here well: when authority is used to dictate a majority vote onto a minority, its precisely democratic in a simple sense and authoritarian in every sense. It’s why I support a democracy which first has intense debate about what interests and results will arise from policy before it’s ever up to vote and implementing it once there’s a lot of consensus among parties. Cuba is the best example of this, but Vietnam, China and the USSR are also fine examples)

    On these standards, both the USSR and China (as well as most other major socialist countries commonly called undemocratic) are much more democratic than the US or any western state. The approval ratings (even by western polls within these nations) are much higher than western nations. This is because both the authority and democracy is oriented towards workers as opposed to the owners (meaning that private property and owners/management profits is not prioritized over the workers/people who work for wages).

    randint,

    Thank you for your reply. I see what’s going on here. We have different definitions for “democracy” and “authoritarianism.”

    commiewithoutorgans, (edited )
    @commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net avatar

    Then what are yours? We can work from there if you’d prefer: I’m familiar with lots of philosophers of lots of traditions who’ve talked about such

    Edit to add: something a lot of Marxists understand in relation to 'we have different definitions" as an attempt to avoid the discussion about the real material thing. Even if definitions are different, we both are attempting to articulate about SOMETHING. That thing doesn’t change when the word used for it does. I’m describing very real phenomenon, and I’m sure you have a phenomenon in your head too. We can discuss those, and it doesn’t matter what they’re called. Otherwise, this just ends all discussion with both able to walk away feeling that they’re right while there is still likely a huge contradiction between the phenomenon that needs explored

    GarbageShoot,

    Authoritarianism is a buzzword. All governments are organized around the exercise of authority or the threat thereof. In a genuine democracy, unlike the US, the authority is directed by the popular vote, but that doesn’t make it less of an authority. The state is the mediator of and apparatus for class antagonism, there is always going to be a class that uses it and a class that it is used against, the question in both cases is merely which class? The Marxist says that the state should be controlled by the proletariat (via democracy) and used against the bourgeoisie as the proletariat sees fit for the current conditions.

    If you mean autocracy, oligarchy, or beauracracy, just use one of those words instead because it actually describes something

    GoodEye8,

    In this case the the definition of “authoritarian” is taken from a rather anarchist perspective, where any any and all infringements on individual liberties is authoritarian. If your mother calls you in the morning and tells you to get up, that’s an authoritarian action because, theoretically, your mother is trying to overrule your individual freedom to sleep for as long as you want. It also means any community you’re a part of that has a set of rules (not matter how lax) in place is an authoritarian community because they’re infringing on your individual freedom to do whatever you want. Even the Engels piece referenced before implies the authoritarianism of the process of work (if you want to work as a collective you need to agree on certain rules that ultimately infringe on your freedom).

    It’s a perfectly fine definition if you want to get philosophical, but in your day to day it’s a pretty useless definition. By this definition all civilizations throughout history have been authoritarian, because all of us have to sacrifice a piece of our freedom/individuality to co-exist in a society. Even the pre-civilization clan mentality is authoritarian, because you have to sacrifice some individuality to be a part of a clan. Thus accepting some level of authority is a fundamental part of any society which is why the strictly philosophical definition of authoritarianism IMO has no practical value, because it ends up stating that almost everything in your daily life is authoritarian (to some degree).

    And to explicitly state why democracy and authoritarianism isn’t viewed as opposites, it’s because by that same definition democracy is authoritarianism. You willfully sacrifice some individual freedoms to allow the will of the people to flourish.

    Tofu_Lewis,

    Yeah dawg that’s … the entire point of the Engels piece - “authoritarianism” is a meaningless buzzword.

    kool_newt,

    I see the Fediverse and federation a lot like the real world. And just like the real world there can and should be protected enclaves and there should be places where the real world exists also.

    The real world often has people that don’t agree with you, or are annoying, but that’s what comes with reality. Besides disagreement and annoyance you also get a greater exchange of ideas, a better chance to grow and learn.

    Those that feel the need for a sanitized experience for whatever reason (e.g. kids, at work, personal sensibilities, etc) can and should choose instances like Beehaw. But there should also be instances that are exposed to the real world to whatever extent is practical (i.e. not a legal risk, not calling for genocide, etc.)

    I’m here because lemm.ee is closer to the real world. I’ve had my arguments w/ Hexbear (and had a great time arguing our views of Tiananmen Square 1989 even though we don’t agree). Hexbear is not full of bad people, they may be a bit much, but the spectrum of humanity should be appreciated.

    natanael,

    Don’t forget that the nature of online spaces vs physical don’t give a realistic view of relative size of communities and popularity of opinions. It’s much easier for loud minorities to claim undue power.

    CrypticCoffee, (edited )

    Thank you for your candour, and much respect for you going against what could have been personally easy for you to do. Your adherence to your principles over your emotions and personal experiences show a really strong character.

    This instance is my go to, recommended instance. You’ve shown great technical leadership and now you’re showing leadership in moderation. If people don’t want to see hexbear, they have a choice in .world or beehaw (who seem to defederate quicker than Chelsea putting in a bid for a player they’ve just heard of). The fact that .ee can differentiate gives users that freedom to choose.

    I do think that those opposed to federation with hexbear are a loud minority and using the same arguments as was applied against lemmygrad and lemmy.ml. In many cases they aren’t nuanced views, just recycled lines repeated. It’s so frequently and so similar, I have wondered if it’s brigading. Is this people who were on exploding heads that are still angry and trying to get even?

    Please ignore the initial hot response you’ll get, and give people time to come to terms with and accept what you’ve said. They often push and push and push until you yield, and you need to keep strong to maintain this as your choice, which it should be. Even if you do defederate later, do it on your terms and based on clear criteria of what you feel is right. Many will agree with my view, but don’t always wade in on debates. Often the ones that respond are the ones that are most emotionally agitated. I am responding to show support for you and what you have been through, and thank you for your transparency. I respect your integrity.

    For disclosure: I am a leftie, but personally opposed to communism. I am opposed to authoritarianism on both sides of the political spectrum. I welcome debate with people that differ from them views. I’m already frequently immersed in debate with Americans that have a very different view of capitalism, and I can live with that. I ain’t a snowflake, and I don’t endorse cancel culture (I do feel a whiff of irony here and I think it’s important to raise that rhetoric the right often throw at at the left, because if you believe if free speech, you believe in free speech).

    CrypticCoffee,

    One point I’ll add that I think needs saying is that these folk set up after CTH got banned from reddit. They were pushed into an echo chamber against their choice. It’s been years now, and they’ve got used to that echo chamber and how they behave around each other. Federating means that culture that they have been used to for years is now not the only way to operate and could be problematic for them. It will take some time to bed in, and realise low effort in joke meme’s just won’t work. They will be outside their comfort zones and it could be disconcerting, but will learn to adjust. Some quicker than others.

    The point I am making is that initial impressions may not reflect the behaviour 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year or 2 years down the line. Do we believe that people should be pushed to the fringe in echo chambers, or do we believe that maybe reddit’s content policies are probably more geared to atmosphere and money than what is correct for an online discussion forum?

    Perhaps some would even realise that instance isn’t right for them, and while they can interact with it, and have that freedom they feel more at home with general purpose instances.

    StalinwasaGryffindor,

    Hi, I just want to say that to many of us in hexbear what you see as an echo chamber is a safe space. Most of us live in capitalist countries and are constantly being exposed to capitalist propaganda.

    Personally, I like having a place where I can discuss things important to me without having to be constantly contradicted by people with what I view as a very shallow understanding of history and geopolitics. It’s honestly kind of silly to pretend that people on the left don’t get their opinions and views challenged, we are absolutely inundated with different views on a daily basis

    CrypticCoffee,

    I understand the concept of a safe space. I’m referring to the pro-China/Russia views. I’m a British democratic socialist. A proud lefty. I dislike large countries and their foreign policy (Russia, China and US). With that, I dislike my government’s conduct in the world, and their actions in support Israel, and Saudi etc. I am frequently dismayed and embarrassed. However, some of the pro Stalin stuff is weird, disturbing and has festered for a while. Can you be principled when you condemn some atrocities and rationalise away others?

    I will engage in debate of course, and challenge where fit. I don’t think that echo chamber was good in some respects.

    StalinwasaGryffindor,

    So, I’m sure that as a proud lefty you understand the concept of critical support, but just in case: most of us are not pro-China/pro-Russia, but have support -with criticisms when warranted- of their role in ending the current global system of US hegemony. I won’t go into Russia too much, as I think they’re a terrible capitalist country with deeply regressive laws but I do support them in their fight against nato and in giving another option for global south countries to reach out to when it comes to trade and military support.

    China to me is a much clearer example of a country that has the opportunity to become a superpower without the truly horrendous bloodshed that has been a feature of American dominance. They also, in my opinion, have shown themselves to take climate change much more seriously than most countries, and given the daily news stories of the devastation we’re seeing I’m very grateful that a large country is making the steps they are.

    When it comes to the Stalin memes, some of it is ironic, but a lot of it is serious. Stalin wasn’t perfect and definitely made mistakes, but his leadership of the Soviet Union was instrumental in defeating nazism and for that alone he deserves critical support.

    Historical_General,

    I do think that those opposed to federation with hexbear are a loud minority and using the same arguments as was applied against lemmygrad and lemmy.ml. In many cases they aren’t nuanced views, just recycled lines repeated. It’s so frequently and so similar, I have wondered if it’s brigading. Is this people who were on exploding heads that are still angry and trying to get even?

    I’ve been wondering too.

    N0_Varak,

    From what I’ve seen of hexbear users in the wild, we wouldn’t lose much by defederating. Their shitposting and general antagonism to anyone right of Stalin adds nothing to instances beyond their own

    nxdefiant,

    The U.S. government puts out travel advisories for countries, informing its citizens about the relative safety of those places.

    For the really bad ones, there are dire warnings about how likely death is.

    There are probably many places people shouldn’t visit on the fediverse, and I think what’s missing is a way of warning people that they might be stumbling into one of those places. If instances could issue “advisories” to let people know that they’re about to visit a hive of shit posters and putlerbots, and flagging accounts as belonging to such hives, it would go a long way toward solving the problem.

    I say this because defederation is tantamount to a travel ban, and that’s a big step.

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar

    hive of shit posters and putlerbots

    wow so civil, so refined. and your last comment was on our instance too. 0 self awareness. Does watching bad scifi melt your brain or something?

    nxdefiant,

    I’m not just a fan, I’m a member! (just not this account)

    axont,

    Hey, Star Trek is good sometimes :(

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar

    tbh I personally liked ds9 and lower decks.

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    This is the 24th (century) type of liberalism.

    (I kid, I kid)

    TrashGoblin,

    Hey, now. Star Trek is a good show, which upholds Marxist-Posadist thought.

    picard-pointing

    GarbageShoot,

    The U.S. government puts out travel advisories for countries, informing its citizens about the relative safety of those places.

    For the really bad ones, there are dire warnings about how likely death is.

    Let’s be fair, some of them are just politically motivated. The US government is not the most reliable source on such information.

    Anyway, let me know when Hexbear kills someone. What would that even be in this analogy? Making them delete their account?

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    If Hexbear kills anyone it’ll be our first poster to die of dehydration whilst posting for 72hrs uninterrupted. But we’ll probably get of a new thesis on posadism out of it.

    pythonoob,

    That’s my main concern as well. I’ve asked a couple basic questions about their terminology and that is usually answered mostly straight, but with vocab that is so leftist and so foreign I don’t even understand it. And I think that’s the heart of the problem really. They have their own culture and own language over there and they come over here using it and antagonizing people who respond speaking essentially a different language. They claim to want to spread leftism but what I mostly see is them harassing people that were just doing their own thing before all this.

    I’m fine with interacting with people of different ideologies and cultures, but I feel like the hexbears mostly just want to harass us “tankies”.

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar

    MODS MODS MODS A BRIGADER LOOK HE’S FROM PROGRAMMING.DEV

    If you hate tankies so much then I have news for you. Look at the main lemmy dev’s github lmao.

    hypelightfly,

    This is exactly what they're talking about and defederation should happen.

    pythonoob,

    Yeah see, why the flame and anger? We’re here having a discussion. Case in point.

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar
    1. Starts with an insult.
    2. gets insulted back

    “bro chill I’m having a discussion chill”

    pythonoob,

    Weird take but ok

    420blazeit69,

    You’re coming into a thread after it has 1000+ comments, which itself is subsequent to a lot of informal discussion. There’s context here.

    Part of that context is repeated accusations of Hexbear users brigading. The concept of brigading has its own issues, but to whatever degree it’s a real problem, users from other instances dropping in because a thread pops up in their feed (as you presumably did) is not brigading. Users from many instances have said they aren’t always sure where they are in every thread post-federation, and Hexbear users have said that, too.

    hypelightfly,

    The majority of those comments all come from one instance and mostly are derailing the thread and any attempt at discussion. Can you guess which one?

    pythonoob,

    I haven’t said a thing about brigading, so I’m not sure why that’s relevant to me in particular. And I am one user from programming dev, a pretty neutral instance. That’s hardly brigading.

    LinkedinLenin,

    Fwiw that user specifically has been shitflinging a lot and they’re a relatively new account. I suspect they’re either someone from Hexbear that doesn’t want federation to work out, or a third party just trying to upset people.

    It wasn’t relevant to you in particular at all, just a weird transference of aggression, as if every user holds the same opinions and inherently knows the nuances of this debate.

    pythonoob,

    Yeah there does seem to be a lot of various in individual user opinion, which I think is important to take into account with things like defederation. My earlier comment was based on reading through some of the comments on hexbear’s new posting guidelines thread. So I admit, hardly all encompassing.

    LinkedinLenin,

    Just in case you’re reading this as an attack on you:

    as if every user holds the same opinions and inherently knows the nuances of this debate.

    I meant that the other user was acting as if you were one of the people accusing us of brigading simply for posting on a non-local instance, when it’s pretty clear you weren’t.

    pythonoob,

    I understood but thank you for clarifying.

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar

    They claim to want to spread leftism but what I mostly see is them harassing people that were just doing their own thing before all this.

    Is this civil? Is this not antagonistic?

    pythonoob,

    I don’t believe this is antagonistic. This is an observation, albeit an anecdotal one. You’re welcome to prove me wrong.

    I will say today, especially in this thread, I have noticed more polite discourse from lots of hexbear’s. Still some antagonistic ones too though.

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar

    You are either obstinate or lack the bare minimum level of self awareness. Your lack of self awareness is being fueled by coddling by my fellow hexbear users. Defederate from us. Leave Lemmy, Go back to Reddit.

    pythonoob,

    You can defederate if it’s such a problem for you to have to interact with other humans that don’t believe the same as you. Sounds like it’s you who’s been coddled in your echo chamber over there. I say you take your own advice.

    hypelightfly,

    You can try to shift the blame all you want but your admins aren't doing anything about it despite it being reported.

    420blazeit69,

    You’re right, it wasn’t relevant to you in particular. You got that comment because of the context surrounding this thread. Say you run a book club or game group and lots of people are chronically late, annoying you. One day a new member shows up a little late with a legit excuse but you fire off a snide comment to them in your frustration at the overall situation. They didn’t deserve that, you were a little quick on the trigger, but can you see how the larger context affects what was said?

    I also agree that you aren’t brigading. The Hexbear users here came to this thread the same way you did, and they aren’t brigading, either.

    pythonoob,

    Makes sense. I also don’t think hexbear’s are brigading. It just seems like that to people who are used to seeing such an influx of posts from one instance.

    420blazeit69,

    Yeah, I don’t think a lot of folks really grasp how large and active Hexbear is.

    Historical_General,

    Are you an actual python noob? I’ve literally started reading a few chapters of Automate the Boring Stuff, and I’ve got it all so far, but it’s slow going. Any tips?

    pythonoob,

    I am a python noob lol. I’ve been going through 100 days of code with Dr. Yu on udemy. The only advice I can give is keep it up. Try to code everyday, don’t get discouraged if you don’t understand something right away.

    Also don’t burn yourself out by taking on too much at once. It’s better to do a little and keep up the momentum than to do a lot and take a 3 week break, do a lot again, another break… Etc.

    Historical_General,

    I’ve taken a break ☹️ Will do some soon.

    I had trouble with this, the first question I saw on codewars. I think I went in too early without really knowing enough and had trouble.

    pythonoob,

    Why don’t you come visit programming.dev. it’s generally a pretty chill place and I’d like to see more python action over there in general. I’m down to help but I don’t think this thread is the best place.

    Historical_General,

    Is it appropriate to use the Python community there or is there one for noobs?

    pythonoob,

    If you have python specific questions then I think that would be fine, as long as you’ve done your due diligence. If you’ve got questions about something like codewars we have this community: !no_stupid_questions

    socsa,

    The reality is that they aren’t even good leftists either. They are constantly saying shit which would get you laughed out of any freshman polisci course. They are low-information, reactionary campists, and the internet deserves a better class of socialist.

    sharedburdens,

    Oh no not the freshman polisci course! those degrees are only good for wiping my ass

    GarbageShoot,

    but I feel like the hexbears mostly just want to harass us “tankies”.

    Huh? Do you mean “liberals”? Hexbears are the ones liberals and leftcoms call “tankies”

    pythonoob,

    From what I can tell, which so far is decidedly little, everyone is calling everyone tankies. Maybe I’m wrong but that just goes back to my first point of speaking a different language.

    I don’t even really consider myself fully liberal, more progressive centrist. You calling all of us liberals is jarring tbh.

    GarbageShoot,

    If you’re a centrist in the west, you are a liberal in the political philosophy sense (though not in American slang). Liberals are in the tradition of people like Locke, which is the entire anglophone mainstream.

    It’s gotta be tough following inconsistent definitions as a non-native speaker, but “tankie” is a pejorative used to refer to people who support socialist states (and, inexplicably, people call Russian sympathizers tankies despite Russia not being socialist).

    Historical_General,

    I hate those people who bleat about people being ‘tankies’ too. They’re everywhere and seem to be brigading and provoking the hexbear people for some reason.

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    A lot of Hexbear users are well versed in political theory and philosophy and to some degree the instance serve as a big reading group (as well as fun, hobbies, and shitposting) so I can definitely see how that could be a bit intimidating to stumble into. But in general people are passionate about sharing information, books, articles etc so if you’re unsure of anything just ask for an explanation and you’ll find plenty of people eager to help.

    pythonoob,

    I appreciate that.

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    No problem. Hope to see you in the future!

    socsa, (edited )

    Exactly. I have seen no evidence that they have any motivation beyond trolling, and if you look at their instance, it is filled with threads about “dunking on libs” and whatnot. Obviously they are just going to tell you whatever it takes to troll another day, because that’s what they do. But if you look broadly at how they participate, it’s obvious that when they say “exposure to differing opinions,” they mean being aggressive, condescending trolls.

    OrangeJoe,

    Personally I am fine using the tools available to me right now to filter and block things I do not want to see. And I assume with the upcoming personal ability to block entire instances, the brigading issue will resolve itself too. So in that regard, keeping them federated or not won’t make much of a difference.

    However… The Kremlin propaganda stuff you talk about seems to be quite prevalent. And while they may not all choose to actively brigade, when they show up in thread comments, they tend to completely dominate the thread and specifically all seem to post very similar things. And while I have seen plenty of levelheaded comments from their users, i have also seen a ton of trolling as well.

    So again I don’t know if defederation is the solution. I think there’s a place for discussion of people with differing opinions, and curating a completely safe space doesn’t do anyone any real favors. But when interaction goes beyond polite discourse it just breeds hostility and makes places toxic. And at the very least, some of their views and the way they choose to interact with others has been creating a feeling of toxicity to the point that I have seen many many users sick of that instance and to the point that posts like these seemingly need to be made.

    august_senpai,

    Defederation should only be done against instances that are full of bots or have technical issues (such as that one instance that had its time wrong for a while, causing problems.)

    WarmSoda,

    Agree 100% with this.

    raptir,

    I would argue that instances with a large amount of illegal content would be a good case for defederation as well, but I don’t know where the line is. Like I don’t want us to block piracy communities, but if an instance has CP or something it should be blocked. So the line is somewhere between the two.

    EremesZorn,

    I’m not a part of this instance, but fuck all tankies. Not sorry to say so either.

    tron, (edited )

    At 21 hours old, this lemm.ee meta post has 1123 comments and 3/4ths of the comments are from hexbear users. They brigade every thread with their non sense and it is impacting lemmy in a very negative way. We wouldn’t be having this discussion if it wasn’t. I don’t really like defederation if it was a tool to silence ideology but what hexbear users do is not really debate ideology and more aggressive in your face bad faith argument trolling. This is a spam instance that should be treated as such. Block it.

    alcoholicorn,

    brigade

    It’s not brigading, this is the top thread on both of our instances and the admin OK’d our input. blahaj had 2 Hexbear federation threads, one including everyone and one just for blahaj users.

    Also hexbear doesn’t have downvotes, so we have a culture of responding to add or refute information.

    debate ideology

    We’re pretty disdainful of debate culture. A discussion where both people are trying to appeal to a third party instead of have a genuine discussion is inherently in bad faith.

    NuPNuA,

    I keep hearing a lot about “our culture” to excuse behaviours that are getting peoples backs up. However in real life it’s pretty wide knowledge that you may have to temper your behaviour outside of your culture if you go abroad or the like. Should this not apply if you’re in someone else’s instance on here too?

    Fibby,

    They just explained that they lacked down votes in their instance. So instead of downvoting, they reply and explain their thought process. I haven’t seen anything rude in the replies either.

    And what the fuck does “temper your behavior outside your culture” mean? That just sounds like anti immigration bullshit lol.

    NuPNuA,

    I mean, I was kind of talking the other way around, if I go from the west to a Middle Eastern country I’d have to change my behaviour, what I wear, etc.

    Tipping is a good example here, in the UK we don’t do tipping in the same way as the US, but if we travel there we would be expected to and “we don’t do it like that in our country” isn’t an acceptable answer. Same here, I don’t buy, “we don’t have downvotes so have to send a picture of a pig having a Tom tit” as a valid excuse for behaviour either.

    NailBunny, (edited )

    Sure one might change their behaviors when traveling accordingly, but I think people would be generally understanding if an American tried to tip in the UK, and I would hope a waitress in America would understand why someone from the UK might not tip. With federation that cultural overlap is even more understandable because it’s not like I’m getting on a plane and traveling across the ocean, I’m just clicking a link that was already on my All on Hexbear. We’re also a lot larger/more active of an instance with almost quadruple the active monthly users of lemm.ee, and Hexbear has been around for about 3 years. A lot of the “brigading” people see is just the result of there being many active bears + this stuff showing up on our feeds + it being directly about us. When you consider all of these things, does it make a bit more sense why we might show up like a swarm of locusts throwing around our own inside jokes?

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    It does, for the most part we do, and we a have specific, different set of rules for posting in other instances.

    You’re also elsewhere in this thread throwing unprompted insults around.

    NuPNuA,

    Yeah, they didn’t go up until you’d spent several days posting pigs shitting all over the place and getting defeded from other subs though did they?

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    I believe we were preemptively defederated from those instances, with a common rationale being that we weren’t pro-NATO and them not sharing our politics in general.

    As for the rules being new in response to federation, you seem to be complaining that we’re doing exactly what you asked us to do above.

    I suspect there’s no behaviour or amount of effort you’d accept. If that’s the case you should just say so.

    NuPNuA,

    Didn’t the Canadian instance have to defed you because you wouldn’t stop wishing violence on people?

    Also, I’d imagine most people in this instance are pro-Nato, most sensible people are, what’s the difference?

    brain_in_a_box,

    Didn’t the Canadian instance have to defed you because you wouldn’t stop wishing violence on people?

    No

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    I just went and checked. That rationale was based on one tongue in cheek ‘execute the landlords’ type comment in response to thr speculative housing market making Toronto unaffordable to live.

    Lols,

    so it was in fact over wishing violence on people

    kneel_before_yakub,

    Yeah and it’s fucking right. Kill your landlord

    Lols,

    do you feel like hexbear users actively calling for killings, while other hexbear users absolutely swear that ‘theyre actively calling for killings’ is a total misinterpretation of their wholesome culture, is going to hurt your credibility

    do you feel like credibility might be useful, for instance if youre actively trying to convince people to change their political views or behaviours

    brain_in_a_box,

    No

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    There’s plenty of implicit calls for violence on that sub, they dug for a specific example to use as an excuse because of their political stance, and that example was basically the equivalent of someone saying ‘Eat The Rich’ by a user with no power to do anything about it. I don’t think anyone thinks actionable threats and comments like that are analogous, but even if they do, surely all promotion of violence is objectionable or none is.

    Lols, (edited )

    There’s plenty of implicit calls for violence on that sub, they dug for a specific example to use as an excuse because of their political stance

    surely all promotion of violence is objectionable or none is.

    did they actually give any reason to believe that theyre a hypocrite with a political chip on their shoulder as opposed to just being against calls for violence

    i also just dont really agree that all promotion of violence is equal, and considering the content, culture and even moderation policy of hexbear i honestly doubt that you or most hexbear users do agree with that stance

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    Because as far as I can tell that’s the only one they’ve ever used to defederate. Because it’s such a silly, jokey, slogany, non-actionable example. And finally because this has been a pattern with numerous instances that pre-emptively defederate before we’d ever even engaged with them at all, based on absurd deliberate misrepresentations of individual comments. We had one the other day which claimed that when some one off handedly said Death to NATO they were advocating and planning the genocide of every single person living in a NATO aligned country.

    As for your other question, I don’t believe that all violent rhetoric is equal (and I doubt many other Hexbear users would either). I thinks it’s dependent on context, arguements of credible self defense, and the risks of how actionable it is amongst other things. But if you deliberately choose and only enforce the silliest, least serious example then either you’re doing it disingenuously or it’s a blanket, no tolerance approach that treats all cases equally. This is what they went with and as I’ve pointed out it’s not the latter, so I think it’s the former.

    Lols,

    But if you deliberately choose and only enforce the silliest, least serious example then either you’re doing it disingenuously or it’s a blanket, no tolerance approach that treats all cases equally. This is what they went with and as I’ve pointed out it’s not the latter, so I think it’s the former.

    thats fair

    We had one the other day which claimed that when some one off handedly said Death to NATO they were advocating and planning the genocide of every single person living in a NATO aligned country.

    if this is the case i think it is, i understood ‘people of NAVO’ to mean actual NAVO officials, with emphasis on the fact that those are people, especially after their elaboration

    as such i didnt read their comment as framing ‘death to NAVO’ as calling for the genocide of every NATO aligned country, rather assuming that it was calling for violence against the people that actually make up the organization

    given the image of NATO officials on hexbear, i dont feel like that was an unfair assumption even if its not necessarily an accurate one, and I dont feel like assuming it was done disingenuously is fair especially when taking into account that the person in question still seemed to prefer federation

    again, assuming were talking about the same case

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    I think we are, but I only briefly saw it in passing. I don’t think anyone on Hexbear read it as a call to kill people in the organisation of NATO (although I doubt many would she’d many tears either) but as a wish to see the demise of the institution. Our instance also has specific rules about that sort of thing.

    Anyway, I was using it to help illustrate the barrage of bad faith misrepresentations we’ve been dealing with constantly, especially from instances that we’ve never even interacted with, but it’s by no means the only one. Other preemptive defederations for example have all fixated on these kind of wild misrepresentations only to finally concede that we weren’t pro-NATO enough. So when we see these kind of bad faith takes and plumbing the depths to find a comment amongst an instance of 20,000 users and 3 years of posts (usually mixed with generic anti-commie abuse in the threads for good measure) we definitely tend to assume the actual reasons are political.

    Even here there’s a lot of those same signs. I’m not saying that’s the case by the way, and I think it’s clear from myself and others that plenty of us are engaged and here in good faith. But I mention it because it’s part of the reason there’s also been some pretty salty and skeptical Hexbears users pop into the thread too - especially in reaction to some of the more openly hostile comments about us.

    DoiDoi, (edited )
    @DoiDoi@hexbear.net avatar

    There a plenty of very sensible people who have issues with NATO. If you’re interested in an intro into one of the reasons why that is I’d recommend reading To Kill a Nation: The Attack on Yugoslavia by Michael Perenti.

    www.versobooks.com/…/1721-to-kill-a-nation

    It’s on sale for only $3 right now!

    GarbageShoot,

    most people in this instance are pro-Nato, most sensible people are

    “Why do hexbears keep bringing their political opinions into things?”

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar

    Lmao in their defederation thread they had one of their guys use holocaust denail dogwhistles. I’m happy they defederated. The fact that you sympathize with those nazis just shows what type of scum you are. I’ll be happy when you defederate too.

    alcoholicorn,

    He just relayed what he read in the lemmy.ca thread, wtf are you going on about?

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar
    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    Can you explain what the difference is between ‘brigading’ and just users posting? How can a community that’s been the or one of the most active for over 3 years when it wasn’t federeated or connected with anyone, be a “spam instance”?

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar

    It’s bad faith trolling to defend ourselves? It’s not our fault you don’t understand how federation works. Go back to reddit if you want your enforced echo chamber back.

    OkToBeTakei,

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • GarbageShoot,
    OkToBeTakei,

    deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    Why are you spamming the same comment (calling Hexbear users abusers, a gross and offensive comment to victims of abuse) again and again?

    OkToBeTakei,

    deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • nat_turner_overdrive,
    @nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net avatar

    You claim hexbears are brigading, and yet here you are adding nothing to the discussion and spamming. This is both ironic and in extremely bad faith.

    OkToBeTakei,

    deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • nat_turner_overdrive,
    @nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net avatar

    this tactic of trying to minimize the victims of real abuse by comparing it to posting on the internet is pretty disgusting and reflects poorly on lemm.ee

    oregoncom,
    @oregoncom@hexbear.net avatar

    appeal to authority. special pleading.

    steltek,

    If those long threads were mostly on topic (about federation), that would at least be something. They present interesting view points but at all the wrong times and in huge numbers. This post is about examining their behavior and their effect on conversations. I think they’ve shown it to us.

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    This is at least a two way street. People from Hexbear have a right to defend themselves when you call them Nazis and compare them to ISIS like you have elsewhere in this thread.

    steltek,

    To avoid misrepresentation, I’ll quote my original proposition:

    It was not to compare ideologies but the end result of extremism and radicalization. Words become violent action and a willingness to forego peaceful change.

    The casual introduction and acceptance of capital punishment and “useful” applications of police brutality, as if they were common tools in a political toolbox, is a mark of the beginning of that very shift.

    Anyway, I’ve spent far too much time in here so I’m trying to put this whole post behind me. My own personal “disengage”, I guess? I just didn’t want to leave while being lumped in with the other people leaving crude, shallow dismissals as Russian tankies/bots/shills/trolls/whatever. I entered these conversations with a neutral viewpoint on Hexbear, not even in favor of defederation, but that has sadly changed quite a bit.

    brain_in_a_box,

    What are you talking about? Political ‘moderates’ introduce and accept capital punishment and useful applications of brutality all the time.

    macabrett,

    I’m not going to engage with you on anything other than the “disengage”, but part of our “disengage” rule is that you absolutely cannot dump a bunch of text in an argument and end it with “disengage”. You need to actually disengage when you say “disengage”.

    MolotovHalfEmpty,
    @MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net avatar

    You added that rationalization ten hours later and still compared us to Nazis.

    Views on capital punishment vary across Hexbear, but in general I’d argue we’re generally anti. The idea we’re a pro-police brutality sub is absurd, given that ACAB and the police being the violent oppressive shock troops of capital are one of the the only views that’s basically agreed upon across Hexbear.

    You seem to be misrepresenting the fact that while most communists (and not all of our users are communists) dislike, but understand the sad necessity of some degree of state violence in order to protect itself from hostile forces like coups and terrorism. All states believe this, it’s known as ‘the monopoly on violence’ but communists broadly want to achieve global revolution in order to move past the need for the destructive elements of the state (although I admit this is a pretty utopian, very long term goal). I’d be happy to send you some reading or video lectures on the subject if you’d like, but it sounds like you’re not interested.

    And just a note in case you do pop over to Hexbear in the future, the disengagement rule we have isn’t a tool to send a long post and have the final word. But I’m also not interested in hounding you if you just want to move on. Hope you enjoy the rest of your day.

    iesou,

    Stay federated. People only think they want an echo chamber.

    Hadriscus,

    Nice to meet you and thanks for hosting this instance !

    I was insulted pretty crudely by a couple hexbear users, unprovoked. However I also understand not everybody has anger issues and I can give other users the benefits of the doubt. I would vote to not defederate.

    egonallanon,

    I’m all for staying federated. They’re style of posting isn’t to my taste but I’m not seeing any broad trends that lead me to see the requirement for defederation.

    a1_15, (edited )

    hexbear should be defederated.

    edit: look up neo-terrorism. that is what they are attempting to do. very akin to the “Libs-of-tiktok” incident. they pose as left wing folks online, but cite to boost anger against people who lean more toward Left. they’re NOT leftists.

    JackBruh,

    Pretty sure the people over there lean more towards left than your average Liberal.

    Astroturfed,

    I believe what he’s trying to say is there’s a bunch of trolls who don’t actually give a fuck about the ideology. They’re just there to troll and acting like tankies.

    gayhitler420,

    Hexbear is an op is not a post I expected to see.

    loboaureo,

    First of all, a great hug to you, it’s seems that the ownership/moderation of this instance hurts you. As enjoy-er of this instance, you got my gratitude.

    I think that de-federation should be only for extreme instances that allow the worst crimes, besides that, i think that every one should be his own judge. As you stated is a problem that you cant block an instance currently, but hopeful this will be solved soon,

    Sorry, English is not my first language.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • meta@lemm.ee
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines